MercurialBlue

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by MercurialBlue 3y ago

   I'm not arguing for nor against regulations, I'm simply commenting on the whole "well, it's technically not stealing, therefore it is OK" debacle, all that means is that legally speaking, it's OK, that does
2. 2.▲
   by MercurialBlue 3y ago

   I do agree with you, but honestly I don't even think that's the biggest problem with these arguments. I'm just sitting here wondering why it is even relevant whether the "AI" is "copying", "learning&q
3. 3.▲
   by MercurialBlue 4y ago

   May I ask what exactly do you dislikes about Nim's garbage collection? You said you "quickly" scanned Nim's page, so I assume you just don't want a GC period? If you're dealing with hard-realtime constraints th
4. 4.▲
   by MercurialBlue 4y ago

   >Identifier equality This is a very surface-level complaint, and it is no surprise that almost everyone who complains about this hasn't actually used the language. I will admit it is indeed a peculiar feature, I wouldn't be abl
5. 5.▲
   by MercurialBlue 4y ago

   From Araq on Nim Forums: > I decided to make Nim "space only" after having read an interview with Guido van Rossum who said that it is what he would do for Python if he were to decide it again. Also, and more importantly, back