MaxikCZ

7 ms·

61.
by MaxikCZ 7mo ago
>incompetence Man..., its 2026 and just yesterday I did "Update and Shutdown" only for it to "Update and Restart" instead. It would be funny if it wasnt that sad..
62.
by MaxikCZ 7mo ago
Neat part is every task becomes overnight task when you start offloading to RAM.
63.
by MaxikCZ 7mo ago
What? Wouldn't they give me more than 1 prompt of compute for my $20, if they had spare?
64.
by MaxikCZ 7mo ago
> Are Anthropic currently unable to sell subscriptions because they don’t have capacity? Absolutely! Im currently paying $170 to google to use Opus in antigravity without limit in full agent mode, because I tried Anthropic $20 subscripti
65.
by MaxikCZ 7mo ago
Im gonna go against the grain here, so hold your pitchforks please, but I think its better than if it were consistent. Let me explain: The author notices that adding a toolbar changes the radius, and to me it makes sense. If theres a toolba
66.
by MaxikCZ 7mo ago
One could argue that if you are buying 512gb RAM machines you are not a typical consumer.
67.
by MaxikCZ 7mo ago
I have Google AI Ultra. Where can I test this? They say its in aistudio, which says its a paid model and I need to setup billing (as if paying for Ultra isnt enough). They say its available in antigravity, but I cant seem to find it there?
68.
by MaxikCZ 8mo ago
Can anybody break my black glasses and offer an anecdote of a high-employee count firm actually involving humans for reading feedback? I suspect its just there for "later", but never actually looked at by anyone...
69.
by MaxikCZ 8mo ago
I dont like that story like this gets upvoted to frontpage top 10 when its just a nothing burger :'(
70.
by MaxikCZ 8mo ago
they don't do this for age verification, they do this to build dataset to sell.
71.
by MaxikCZ 8mo ago
So thats 2M tokens for free basically?
72.
by MaxikCZ 8mo ago
I know, so they didnt event test a single prototype before starting taking orders...
73.
by MaxikCZ 8mo ago
I especially liked the "we tested the lamp we sold as 50k lumens to find out it only did 39k". Like, how do you even go setting up a product page for a product whose main selling point you didnt even test before?
74.
by MaxikCZ 9mo ago
imagine thinking the same way after the first crash, just as long as you can withstand relatives thinking you are literally going to die in their second crash, and then you die in their second crash.
75.
by MaxikCZ 9mo ago
Recently the old reddit szopped working for me even after going to account settings and opting out of new design again (it was already marked as being opt out) across all my devices. Even after manually navigating to old.reddit.com, clickin
76.
by MaxikCZ 10mo ago
I always thought of concrete as cement + water + sand. This video makes aircrete with cement + water + thickening/foaming agent, but it doesnt use any sand, no?
77.
by MaxikCZ 10mo ago
I always remember this old image https://i.imgur.com/MCsOM8e.jpeg
78.
by MaxikCZ 10mo ago
I wonder if Photon doesnt have an inertial frame of reference - from our point of view. Like, from our point of view, we assume that from photons point of view it has no perspective. But maybe we are limited by our spacetime, where photon g
79.
by MaxikCZ 10mo ago
This. Last benchmarks of DSv3.2spe hinted at beating basically everything, yet in my testing even sonnet is miles ahead both in terms of speed and accuracy
80.
by MaxikCZ 10mo ago
I feel like theres a time in near future where LLMs will be too cautious to answer any questions they arent sure about, and most of the human effort will go into pleading the LLM to at least try to give an answer, which will almost always b
81.
by MaxikCZ 10mo ago
The fact that at speed of light time stops is just so bonkers to me. A photon is, from its point of reference, at the point of creation and at the point of destination at the same "time". Its literally seeing both parts of the uni
82.
by MaxikCZ 10mo ago
A lot of great science progress followed after some "fundamental prediction" turned out to be wrong :). Wouldnt it be awesome to learn that blackholes, in fact, do not evaporate at all? That would be exciting
83.
by MaxikCZ 1y ago
Yea, they tend to deflect. Then you send email quoting laws and inform them that next email will be trough lawyers, and they pay out quick (personal experience)
84.
by MaxikCZ 1y ago
Its a double edge sword. Yes, back then 2 year old computer was old, but at the same time every 2 years a new generation of games came out that were like never seen before. Each generation was a massive step-up. Today, a layman couldnt chro
85.
by MaxikCZ 1y ago
Im just a rando on the internet, Ive never inspected the sats to know if they are not using materials that just wont burn up, hence "probably". Im just listing facts to help you make a picture, I am not trying to "defend&quot
86.
by MaxikCZ 1y ago
I pressume its much easier to design something to burn than to do anything else. You are basically just restricting yourself on material selection. The goal isnt for something to not fail, the goal is to fail. Its like asking to build a law
87.
by MaxikCZ 1y ago
Perhaps naive question, but wouldnt also your hardware be waiting for reply from non-existing network? Wouldnt you just add to their DoS power this way?
88.
by MaxikCZ 1y ago
Nah. You want to land, but you are really not shedding most of your velocity until after touchdown. What you gain by burning fuel is energy, and you can either bank it into altitude, or velocity. You must shed both to land, but not so for g
89.
by MaxikCZ 1y ago
> thus have much longer glide range Im gonna be a little pedantic, but the weight has surprisingly small effect on glide range, actually none of the weight affect the range directly, its all from secondary effects. The glide is given mai
90.
by MaxikCZ 1y ago
1) Yea, sorry, turbofan, not turboprop nor a jet. 2) It stays burned, but the energy is banked in potential energy of the aircraft, namely in a form of altitude. If you run out of fuel 5 feet above ground, you dont get to fly far. When you

More ›