Matthyze

8 ms·

1. 61.▲
   by Matthyze 2y ago

   I thought this was satire. What the hell George.
2. 62.▲
   by Matthyze 2y ago

   Right. My point isn't that doctors are particularly good at programming (they're probably not). I mean that some people have skills, or raw talent, that allow them to do what others simply cannot at all.
3. 63.▲
   by Matthyze 2y ago

   https://www.seangoedecke.com/weak-engineers/
4. 64.▲
   by Matthyze 2y ago

   There was a blog post the other day arguing that great developers aren't 10x but infinity-x. It sounds ridiculous, but their point was that great developers don't simply program faster but solve problems other developers are entir
5. 65.▲
   by Matthyze 2y ago

   I'm puzzled by your comment. Do our brains not exist in the real world?
6. 66.▲
   by Matthyze 2y ago

   I really adore this. AI art is at its best when it's strange and uncanny. Another example (watch till the end): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XqLm0qbLJqY edit: I'll add this great take too: https://ww
7. 67.▲
   by Matthyze 2y ago

   Right. And the use-case for PINNs is, e.g., modeling a known function that is not solvable analytically?
8. 68.▲
   by Matthyze 2y ago

   Thanks for the elaborate response! I understand your interpretation, and I agree with the first part of it. (Don't change an existing system without first understanding the implications of that change.') I think that's the co
9. 69.▲
   by Matthyze 2y ago

   Me and a friend were discussing PINNs, and he made an argument against them: The Bitter Lesson. PINNs are a way of incorporating domain knowledge into ML models. The Bitter Lesson, for those unaware, is a famous essay by Rich Sutton that st
10. 70.▲
    by Matthyze 2y ago

    I'm so confused by this reply. Could you please elaborate your interpretation of Chesteron's fence?
11. 71.▲
    by Matthyze 2y ago

    When I read the title, I thought the project would be an LLM browser plugin (or something of the sort) that would automatically use the current page as context. However, after viewing the GitHub project, it seems like a browser interface fo
12. 72.▲
    by Matthyze 2y ago

    Non-Scandinavian version of the article: https://energywatch.com/EnergyNews/Renewables/article1783034... Anyway, that's very hopeful. Glad to hear the good news.
13. 73.▲
    by Matthyze 2y ago

    And—more than anything—the timing.
14. 74.▲
    by Matthyze 2y ago

    Yes, I believe that. Probably showing what they're both capable of doing and willing to do.
15. 75.▲
    by Matthyze 2y ago

    You might argue that forms of fact-checking or moderation of controversial content constituted censorship, but you cannot believe that that equates to such explicit silencing of political opponents.
16. 76.▲
    by Matthyze 2y ago

    My (quite uninformed) take is that it was a show of loyalty from Zuckerberg or Meta to the Trump administration. Tech oligarchs have been trying to curry favor after Trump's win. Due to Meta's previous stance on fact-checking, Met
17. 77.▲
    by Matthyze 2y ago

    A few? A multitude.
18. 78.▲
    by Matthyze 2y ago

    I'm sure there's a sampling bias here. Many intractable methods are never adopted by the developer community exactly because they're intractable, which means such methods won't be encountered often. Like an ant line avoi
19. 79.▲
    by Matthyze 2y ago

    Did you read the article? The author's and your points are entirely tangential.