Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
MattRix
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
91.
▲
by
MattRix
8mo ago
This is a really weird response man. No need to get so judgy and personal. Besides, as far as I can tell what they said is true. The users are losing access to Antigravity, not to their entire Google accounts. So you’re getting mad at this
92.
▲
by
MattRix
8mo ago
The thing is that this is genuinely useful to Googlers as well. If they’re internally dogfooding their tools and models for coding, it seems likely that things will improve.
93.
▲
by
MattRix
8mo ago
This is what people already do with “ralph” loops using the top coding models. It’s slow relative to this, but still very fast compared to hand-coding.
94.
▲
by
MattRix
8mo ago
Anyone who has used OpenClaw knows this is VERY plausible. I don’t know why someone would go through all the effort to fake it. Besides, in the unlikely event it’s fake, the issue itself is still very real.
95.
▲
by
MattRix
8mo ago
I mean, sure, why not?
96.
▲
by
MattRix
8mo ago
I’ve been using it a dozen times a day for the past 14 years with very few issues. Certainly not enough issues that I would ever want to go back to adding things like alarms and reminders and events by hand.
97.
▲
by
MattRix
8mo ago
This is an absurd take. Of course tons of people use Siri. It’s by far the fastest way to create alarms, reminders, and events. If Apple got rid of it, I would feel like a cave man, having to unlock my phone and navigate multiple screens ju
98.
▲
by
MattRix
8mo ago
If you don’t think the quality has improved then you haven’t actually been trying it. Any programmer who knows what they’re doing can immediately tell models like Opus 4.6 and Codex 5.3 are much better than models from a year ago. All the o
99.
▲
by
MattRix
8mo ago
It’s not challenging at all. You leave the buffer. If someone sees the gap and merges into it, that’s fine! You always maintain the buffer. It’s not hard to do. It’s only frustrating if you let it be. It really barely slows you down at all.
100.
▲
by
MattRix
8mo ago
You left out the key line “and you don’t believe me, wait six months”. These models are getting better all the time. The term “vibe coding” was only coined a year ago, around the same time as the release of Claude Code. It doesn’t matter if
101.
▲
by
MattRix
8mo ago
Isn’t that the whole point of this approach? Everything is specified just in terms of how the end user will actually use the software, at a high level. Then the LLMs basically iterate relentlessly until the software matches what the end use
102.
▲
by
MattRix
8mo ago
Of course those are things that happen to people, why would they make them up?! If anything, your reaction seems like an emotional and biased one, refusing to acknowledge the experiences of others when they conflict with your beliefs. (and
103.
▲
by
MattRix
9mo ago
Opus 4.5 only came out two months ago, and yes Anthropic spends a lot of effort making it particularly good at coding.
104.
▲
by
MattRix
9mo ago
Nobody is claiming that this will work in that situation, but there are thousands of much more common situations where it does work and makes driving more safe and enjoyable.
105.
▲
by
MattRix
9mo ago
They have a product where you can make your own whitelabeled video site, which is used by some popular services, ex. Dropout.
106.
▲
by
MattRix
9mo ago
I’m sure it would be fun at first, but it would quickly become frustrating and repetitive.
107.
▲
by
MattRix
9mo ago
I don’t know if this is a joke but isn’t the answer just… a regular RTS game?
108.
▲
by
MattRix
9mo ago
It does seem like that is a pretty fundamental difference. They aren’t giving anything to advertisers, just letting them target ads to users who fit in certain categories or whatever.
109.
▲
by
MattRix
9mo ago
It’s not even really outdated or unused. Just about everyone who makes 2D games still uses the term “sprite” all the time. The meaning has become slightly less specific, but otherwise is really the same.
110.
▲
by
MattRix
9mo ago
I think we fundamentally disagree about what the purpose of icons is. The point isn’t just to be something that looks cool in isolation.
111.
▲
by
MattRix
9mo ago
Eh not sure I agree. The former icons are definitely unique, but not consistent or cohesive at all, especially when viewed as a group. I think these new icons will grow on people. There were similar negative reactions back ~15 years ago whe
112.
▲
by
MattRix
9mo ago
I don’t think they look awful, and they’re more interesting and opinionated than most boring icons you see these days.
113.
▲
by
MattRix
9mo ago
I mean you can download a free sample project for Unity or Unreal and have a 3D FPS Shooter even without AI. If you want to make one from scratch using AI, you’ll still need to provide some kind of art… With that said, yeah Claude Code CAN
114.
▲
by
MattRix
9mo ago
They are proof of MY experience. Accusing me of “webdev butthurt” is pretty funny. considering that: A. I’m not a web dev. B. I have already said multiple times I agree with the actual message of the article! (I just couldn’t read parts of
115.
▲
by
MattRix
9mo ago
I never said things were covered up for YOU, I said they were covered up for ME. Then you implied I was lying, and now that I provided proof your new argument is “Chrome isn’t a valid user agent”. Sure bud.
116.
▲
by
MattRix
9mo ago
I think the argument that “value to users is the only thing that matters” is the blunt one. My point is that most situations are much more nuanced than that.
117.
▲
by
MattRix
9mo ago
Users found value in leaded gasoline too.
118.
▲
by
MattRix
9mo ago
I’ve tried quite a few of these apps/sites, and I like the simplicity of this one.
119.
▲
by
MattRix
9mo ago
The fact is that doctors are human, so they have cognitive biases and make mistakes and sometimes miss things, just like all other humans.
120.
▲
by
MattRix
9mo ago
yeah, and it’s also worth noting that the usual guidelines you hear like “eat 1g of protein for each pound you weigh” are actually meant to be 1g of protein per pound of lean mass , which for many people is significantly smaller amount.
More ›