MattRix

4 ms·

61.
by MattRix 6mo ago
You could use any of the plans depending on your situation.., they will all work in VSCode, so the question is how much usage you need and whether you want to pay for a subscription or directly for usage. If you’re actually asking this ques
62.
by MattRix 6mo ago
I don’t think this holds for all tools in all situations. Sometimes the tools can do too much, especially when they start to do creative things.
63.
by MattRix 6mo ago
That is one factor, but it’s not the whole thing. The other key element is “cognitive offloading” where your brain stops doing stuff when it thinks it is redundant. This is similar to the photo-taking impairment effect where people will rem
64.
by MattRix 6mo ago
No, they are quite different.
65.
by MattRix 6mo ago
I think you have it set to the wrong mode. If you set it to Thinking with “Extended” thinking effort, is it slower but almost never wrong (because it searches the web to get verify all its assumptions and answers).
66.
by MattRix 6mo ago
This is pretty wrong. Anyone who thinks this stuff is similar to NFTs and crypto hasn’t been paying attention.
67.
by MattRix 6mo ago
This is close, but the real problem isn’t that the food is underpriced, it’s that the supply of ingredients is severely limited.
68.
by MattRix 6mo ago
I mean it’s not that bad of a practice, it depends on the context.
69.
by MattRix 6mo ago
100% this. All the abstractions and OOP stuff make you end up with a codebase where half the code doesn’t actually DO anything in the product itself, it just connects to other code! It also becomes impossible to follow the flow of execution
70.
by MattRix 6mo ago
Why not? Not everything has to be SOTA to be interesting.
71.
by MattRix 6mo ago
I think Anthropic did the mythos announcement to undercut OpenAI’s upcoming next model announcement, not Meta’s.
72.
by MattRix 6mo ago
Where is the astroturfing? From what I can tell it’s maybe the fastest growing product/company ever. Anthropic’s products have completely changed how software development gets done across the entire industry, especially in the past fou
73.
by MattRix 6mo ago
This is what happens when you have growth that is exponential instead of linear!
74.
by MattRix 6mo ago
yeesh yep, though it's more Pandora's Box than a can of worms, since it can't exactly be closed once it's opened
75.
by MattRix 6mo ago
I don't see why not, especially with computer use and vision capabilities. Are you talking about their lack of physical embodiment? AGI is about cognitive ability, not physical. Think of someone like Stephen Hawking, an example of havi
76.
by MattRix 6mo ago
The thing is that the current models can ALREADY replicate most software-based products and services on the market. The open source models are not far behind. At a certain point I'm not sure it matters if the frontier models can do fas
77.
by MattRix 6mo ago
They aren’t stopping anyone from using claude -p, they are just charging for that usage.
78.
by MattRix 6mo ago
hah that’s a great way to explain it
79.
by MattRix 6mo ago
This is not lying, that is just what run rate revenue means! It makes sense to use as a metric when a company’s user base is growing as fast as Anthropic’s is.
80.
by MattRix 7mo ago
Brandon Sanderson recently did a talk about something similar: https://youtu.be/mb3uK-_QkOo
81.
by MattRix 7mo ago
I think this is because when you shrink it down, the model ends up space constrained and each “neuron” ends up having to do multiple duties. It can stil be tuned to perform well at specific tasks, but no longer generalizes as well. It’s som
82.
by MattRix 7mo ago
It’s not hypocritical at all. You can be a fan of a technology and still acknowledge its downsides. Every technology has places it is useful and places it is harmful.
83.
by MattRix 7mo ago
what’s to keep people from selling or giving away those id tags? seems like a nefarious entity could buy them in bulk
84.
by MattRix 7mo ago
Fun fact: because WFC is graph-based, you can do stuff like creating a graph where it uses time as a dimension, so you can create animations that “wrap” in time. In this rabbit example I made 8 years ago, the WFC solver ensures that the ani
85.
by MattRix 7mo ago
Nope. As someone who has tried to get tickets, most of the matches are sold out, and even the least desirable matches are quite expensive.
86.
by MattRix 7mo ago
Yes, the LLM writes the specs. In fact that LLM writes everything, and then the humans only flag anything they want changed, other than that it’s completely automated. Imagine you were working with a very talented software shop. You might t
87.
by MattRix 7mo ago
Yup. This is exactly what is going to happen. It’s strange that so many people here can’t seem to extrapolate from the current state of things. It’s inevitable.
88.
by MattRix 7mo ago
Did I say you stated otherwise?
89.
by MattRix 7mo ago
I’d encourage you to read this post: https://factory.strongdm.ai It hit the front page here a few weeks ago, but I don’t think most people took it seriously and got hung up on the $1000/day in tokens part. I am convinced th
90.
by MattRix 7mo ago
The humans working there do. To state otherwise is to absolve those humans of any responsibility.

More ›