Marysville

5 ms·

1.
by Marysville 8y ago
To fix a problem, you need to frame the problem correctly. And at least in the political sphere, money or talent is not even up for discussion. Even after the effects you mention.
2.
by Marysville 8y ago
It won't be a messed up situation if the politicians said what you just pointed. The employers are taking away jobs of americans, not the immigrants. It will be a totally different debate altogether.
3.
by Marysville 8y ago
`location.hostname!='www.clientdomain.com'?document.body.innerHTML=''`
4.
by Marysville 8y ago
What's stopping a Github or Gitlab or Atlassian employee from going rogue? That's not an MS specific problem.
5.
by Marysville 8y ago
Netflix is paying money to its competitor. i.e. Amazon Prime Video.
6.
by Marysville 8y ago
More than the blame, it will dehumanise those deaths. Like a tree falling in a forest....
7.
by Marysville 8y ago
You should perhaps read on what led to creation of these terrorist organizations. BBCs 'Hypernormalisation' would be a good start.
8.
by Marysville 8y ago
But now you also have. "No I do not consent" buttons. If people are tired of it, they should just stick with 'No'.
9.
by Marysville 8y ago
They made a mistake by releasing all the stings together. They should have released a few first so other players can pounce upon in a hurry to tweet. That would have atleast got the discussion started. Infact "Economic Times" (par
10.
by Marysville 8y ago
Related: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=D1NX2dr3voU
11.
by Marysville 8y ago
I don't think we're going to lose as many "well intentioned" websites as much as we'll get rid of bad intentioned businesses.
12.
by Marysville 8y ago
It's not stopping any well intended company from fairly using data. A law making it harder for well intentioned gun enthusiasts from getting guns is a good law according to me. All well intentioned gun enthusiasts should support it. Ot
13.
by Marysville 8y ago
If a regulation is going to impact "innovative" startups that sell my data, I am totally for it. I don't want more innovative ways to sell my personal information.
14.
by Marysville 8y ago
Google can't make it work because they need to sell out there users. A random company does not need to do that. Even google doesn't do that if you're an enterprise user. So you see google does make it work if you pay them. Th
15.
by Marysville 8y ago
Because not everyone wants to make money by selling out there users. There was advertisement industry before it was even possible to track users.
16.
by Marysville 8y ago
Yes, losing passport is exactly that. Logging out makes me unable to access normal abilities a twitter user(american citizen) has. If passport analogy doesn't suit you, try incarceration.
17.
by Marysville 8y ago
That would be akin to saying you can access your President by giving up your passport. I can't believe people are defending this.
18.
by Marysville 8y ago
I wonder if Elon deliberately blew up Zuck's satellite.
19.
by Marysville 8y ago
India still manages to produce godmen like him. The latest one on the top of the list is 'Sri Sri Ravishankar'. Previous to him was one called 'Asaram', but he and his son are behind bars now, for raping several women.
20.
by Marysville 8y ago
2048 = MIT 2048buntu = Proprietary
21.
by Marysville 8y ago
I wasn't in any way defending the lady. Just that the guy is not at a higher moral ground than her, including the fact that he has multiple restraining orders against him since before this incident.
22.
by Marysville 8y ago
He said he doesn't need apology, because someone at System76 had already apologized on the reditt thread.
23.
by Marysville 8y ago
It's like seat belts. You cannot sell a car without seat belt regardless of customer's choice. The customer's choice come later whether or not he wants to put on the seat belt. Car = Service Seat belt = Tracking protection
24.
by Marysville 8y ago
Normally I'd agree. But it's not the case here. Fredin(the man) is the one who was "online shaming" women, and it fired back at him. Can't say he is a victim of online shaming then.