MarkusQ

47 ms·

1. 811.▲
   by MarkusQ 7y ago

   This is awesome! Now if you could just get an AI to rewrite the content to bring it up to the old (roughly pre-"USA Today") journalistic standards, it would be perfect! But that's probably too much to ask.
2. 812.▲
   by MarkusQ 7y ago

   The ambiguity I was addressing was grammatical, not biological. "now significant" could be a typo for "known significant", "non-significant", "no significant", "not significant", and possibl
3. 813.▲
   by MarkusQ 7y ago

   I don't know what you mean by "now significant mutations" but there are quite a number (hundreds) of known cov-19 mutant circulating. https://nextstrain.org/ncov?c=country&l=unrooted
4. 814.▲
   by MarkusQ 7y ago

   And, back before the fall, it would have been.
5. 815.▲
   by MarkusQ 7y ago

   And apparently no one thought to suggest that the problem was inbreeding?
6. 816.▲
   by MarkusQ 7y ago

   > Viruses [...]have circadian rhythms like all living things. > circadian adj. of, relating to, or showing rhythmic behaviour with a period of 24 hours; especially of a biological process No, they don't. And the rest of the parag
7. 817.▲
   by MarkusQ 7y ago

   The disjointed presentation and numerous typos make this harder to read than the original paper, IMHO.
8. 818.▲
   by MarkusQ 13y ago

   As someone who teaches mathematics (set theory, combinatorics, logic, algebra, etc.) to grade school children, I'd have to say you're way off base. Many first and second grade kids have impressive abstract reasoning skills, thoug