MarciaPetros

4 ms·

1.
by MarciaPetros 13y ago
They were commenting on public events. Not clients or work.
2.
by MarciaPetros 13y ago
That's hilarious. I guess the EFF knows that most of it's supporters are sysadmins, ironically the one class of people with the most direct and unfettered ability to violate privacy--and a track record of having done so.
3.
by MarciaPetros 13y ago
Shop talk is indicative of a general mindset and attitude. "Spies" are not in the business of serving due process. That is the job of lawyers and judges. You would therefore expect that kind of attitude--"if we could, we shou
4.
by MarciaPetros 13y ago
Really? They pay you to make money. Trying to change them just gets you bad performance reviews. Eventually fired or sidelined as a poor team player who doesn't understand the business. I've never heard anything more naive than tr
5.
by MarciaPetros 13y ago
The psychological terror of the Panopticon cannot be overemphasized. The Panopticon is more real now than it ever has been. Watch as former radicals instantly self-censor with these new NSA revelations.
6.
by MarciaPetros 13y ago
This is the nature of all corporate endeavour. The corporate style of organization is very good at certain things and very bad at others. It can't be compared to a human being. It's a different animal.
7.
by MarciaPetros 13y ago
Can you, or anyone else for that matter, prove that installing a few temporary platforms and fake ruins WILL NOT cause actual damage to a waterway? If you can't see that these regulations are there specifically to protect precious natural r