MWil

29 ms·

271.
by MWil 13y ago
To echo what someone else said, the problem here is when presented with the following scenarios: 1) Levison saying "absolutely, you are entitled to Snowden's contact/header details and I will give it to you within 60 days (or
272.
by MWil 13y ago
pg. 76 contains the best argument IMO - no discretion being left to the FBI to ONLY retain header/contact details for Snowden's email and not take the keys to the kingdom
273.
by MWil 13y ago
Free speech arguments begin on pg. 61
274.
by MWil 13y ago
I agree. I think he handled it very well all by himself, especially the hearing about the trap/trace that was NOT about the encryption keys where the govt wished to make it all about the keys.
275.
by MWil 13y ago
That's a great observation and it depends on how you define "exposed." Since it's technically feasible to capture the information, perhaps even retroactively, it's certainly been sent to a third party (Lavabit) for
276.
by MWil 13y ago
pg. 42 - Levison asks to be paid $3500 to gather data himself and relay to FBI after 60 days Govt declines b/c trap/trace is real-time and they find the amount requested to not be reasonable
277.
by MWil 13y ago
His lawyer quit or was fired the day after a conference call on July 10 with FBI about the extent of trap/trace - 5 days before next court date
278.
by MWil 13y ago
Also said "I'm not showing up to court unless you pay me to" - pg. 41 Grand jury subpoena guarantees he would be paid for travel but that subpoena was later withdrawn
279.
by MWil 13y ago
pg. 30 contains what sounds like a much too broad request for any and all public and private keys for ALL lavabit users including HTTPS sessions and SMTP communications, not just Snowden Actual search warrant is much more narrow to just Sno
280.
by MWil 13y ago
Related to the Lavabit case (but more generally) I've been working on researching warrant canaries. Order contains language "minimum interference to the services that are accorded persons with respect to whom the installation and
281.
by MWil 13y ago
Historical note: Same federal magistrate that approved trap/trace approved subpoena for Twitter records in Wikileaks investigation in '11
282.
by MWil 13y ago
Sure enough, trap/trace was ordered 18 days after the govt's initial application was approved by the Court
283.
by MWil 13y ago
(commenting as I read along) pg. 11 - Certification of Business Records Thought he was being asked to install trap/trace/whatever by the govt alongside his equipment - might explain why this wasn't filled out/signed. It
284.
by MWil 13y ago
It's only 147 pages. Is this Vol I and II?
285.
by MWil 13y ago
cntrl+f "not this approach"
286.
by MWil 13y ago
I sent you an email just now about updates to duet and activating since it doesn't seem to be on Envato's site any longer
287.
by MWil 13y ago
That's...yes...that's a boob!
288.
by MWil 13y ago
still one of the greatest Mad TV sketches of all time http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xnnxvNJcx1U
289.
by MWil 13y ago
oh the whole inside is silica and paper towels which are changed (probably should be more frequently)
290.
by MWil 13y ago
Well I'm not sure if moving several times and all other factors have made it exponentially harder to recover the data. It's double wrapped in a thick ziplock inside that shiny metal bag that hdd's come in when purchased out
291.
by MWil 13y ago
I emailed you back.
292.
by MWil 13y ago
Thanks, I hadn't really heard about this. Although at current btc prices, it might actually just be cheaper for me to claim them as "lost" on my taxes than try and recover them
293.
by MWil 13y ago
I wish this could help me recover 3 btc I had in 2010 b/c I still have the HDD. My problem is that my disk is extra dead - it stopped spinning completely. I can't use hiren's boot tools with it like I could my other dead dri
294.
by MWil 13y ago
I think everyone who graffiti'd the closet should come forward and beg to be forgiven for their breaking and entering too and MIT and the Secret Service can throw the book at them. /s
295.
by MWil 13y ago
Yes, the relevant regulations are about commercial use which is COMPLETELY backwards from a privacy standpoint. To answer your question, no, I don't want drones to not exist and it would not be worthwhile if I did. Since they obviousl
296.
by MWil 13y ago
Law students (most) take a class called Criminal Procedure that heavily covers 4th, 5th, and (to a smaller extent) 6th amendment jurisprudence. I took it in 2011 when drones were really heavy in the news cycle. Our final exam was solely on
297.
by MWil 13y ago
I'm just not a fan of drones. In any context. They are 4th amendment eradicators for people like me who live very tall buildings with tall glass windows. It won't be snooping when I'm walking around naked at night, it'l
298.
by MWil 13y ago
nope, two different Android devices involved
299.
Why/How would Verizon track down my new phone numbers with T-Mobile?
2 points by MWil 13y ago|2 comments
300.
by MWil 13y ago
I'm not a developer. I just learned HTML/CSS so I'm a wannabe but there's nothing that I know less about than command-line interfaces.

More ›