MRAutumn

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by MRAutumn 7y ago

   > What you are saying is that because we have a map then we know the terrain. No. What I'm saying is that having a map is better, way better than having nothing and resigning to even try because by definition is imposible to attain
2. 2.▲
   by MRAutumn 7y ago

   > Adding to it, there are things in life which are ineffable. This means they are (by definition), impossible to model or explain with words. Thus, these things will forever evade scientific scrutiny as science cannot deal with the ineff
3. 3.▲
   by MRAutumn 7y ago

   With all due respect, I think it is you the one who's been tricked into the ethereal realm of 'the religious', which you've used often in this thread to get out of the real discussion. The historical debate came about be
4. 4.▲
   by MRAutumn 7y ago

   > Corollary to this is that everybody is Religious and everybody is Scientific, and plays the card when its needed. Only if you define religious as 'spiritual'; as more than the physical atoms that make up a person. If you are