Lkjhmnbv

6 ms·

1.
by Lkjhmnbv 8y ago
There's a lot of research into this. If you're curious you can Google around for transfer learning and one shot learning.
2.
by Lkjhmnbv 8y ago
Heads up Texas holdem is "solved". https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/time-to-fold-huma...
3.
by Lkjhmnbv 8y ago
Great point. Just like Venezuela!
4.
by Lkjhmnbv 8y ago
They have armed guards. They did fix it. :)
5.
by Lkjhmnbv 8y ago
How do you do away with unpopular opinions when people decide they disagree with you?
6.
by Lkjhmnbv 8y ago
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/420131-feds-received...
7.
by Lkjhmnbv 8y ago
Wrong.
8.
by Lkjhmnbv 8y ago
You mean gentrification?
9.
by Lkjhmnbv 8y ago
How "modern man" forgets that the comforts of a "middle class level" are unobtainable for all but the Uber wealthy in the world. Your problems are problems. But they're not real problems. Real problems like starving
10.
by Lkjhmnbv 8y ago
I think it's funny that people still don't know anything about the case that codified that shouting fire in a crowded theater should be illegal. Really not the strongest argument when you just give a blase retort with no actual su
11.
by Lkjhmnbv 8y ago
Until you realize over 50% of the school is the progeny of the 1%. Then you realize what's actually going on.
12.
by Lkjhmnbv 8y ago
I mean I feel like it's obviously true that a successful hijacking means using the plane as a bomb. If you want to just kill a lot of people there are far cheaper and more effective ways. Check out the concerts being attacked. So the d
13.
by Lkjhmnbv 8y ago
Count dankula has a communist flag tattoo. He marched and demonstrated with socialists. The fud is weird.
14.
by Lkjhmnbv 8y ago
Nothing you said is relevant to Dragonfly, or any other of a number of bad decisions by Google. Not everyone is willing to give them the benefit of the doubt any more. I'm sorry that bothers you, but that's reality. You can be mad
15.
by Lkjhmnbv 8y ago
I do understand. You just don't like the conclusion I drew as it paints the company in a bad light. We fundamentally disagree on how companies should behave. That's all.
16.
by Lkjhmnbv 8y ago
I'm not really at all sure how to even begin to respond to that. I mean surely you think that flights AA 11, ua 175, and AA 77 were materially different than UA 93. So I really don't get your point.
17.
by Lkjhmnbv 8y ago
So the choice is: 1. Open the door and the person uses the plane as a big bomb. 2. Don't open the door and the person uses a smaller bomb. You die either way. What's the choice here?
18.
by Lkjhmnbv 8y ago
So your argument is I'm too simple to understand nuance, so you have to speak to me with lies and half truths so I understand. This answer is incredibly condescending.
19.
by Lkjhmnbv 8y ago
With all do respect, that's not the best deterrent. The best deterrent is the door. Anyone who knows anything about the Germanwings crash ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germanwings_Flight_9525 ) knows this. The pil
20.
by Lkjhmnbv 8y ago
I mean I understand what you're saying, I just find it a bit... disappointing? That you'd accept PR speak to be used at all. Honesty should be the rule, and any PR speak, by anyone, should be denounced. I do see your point, I&#x27
21.
by Lkjhmnbv 8y ago
Ok so you weren't saying you were learning things about your company in the NYT, you're saying you are reading things you knew about your company in the NYT? Do I have that correct?
22.
by Lkjhmnbv 8y ago
In the good old days we'd just use ips to connect to irc, and then ask for server ips. Loved dns blocking because I still could do whatever I wanted.
23.
by Lkjhmnbv 8y ago
Perhaps that's the point?
24.
by Lkjhmnbv 8y ago
Yeah I seriously dont understand the point being made. Op likes the culture because it's so open and transparent, but doesn't like that the transparency is shattered by having the nyt report on things internally? Does op just want
25.
by Lkjhmnbv 8y ago
There's a reason that it's called penitentiary. It's because you're supposed to repent and show penance. It's meant to rehabilitate and return people to society after they have not only intellectually understood and
26.
by Lkjhmnbv 8y ago
https://www.forbes.com/sites/eriksherman/2015/12/10/congratu...
27.
by Lkjhmnbv 8y ago
Thank you for the conversation.
28.
by Lkjhmnbv 8y ago
The problem is you don't view it as oppression because your worldview is one where group rights exist. I don't believe in group rights, I believe in human rights. You don't, and that's fine. But fundamentally it is your
29.
by Lkjhmnbv 8y ago
You're the one who forces the government to discriminate because you don't like the world. You just define "politically weak" as people you like and "politically strong" as people you don't. As I keep poin
30.
by Lkjhmnbv 8y ago
You believe that marginalized people in society making something political is illegitimate if you disagree, and legitimate if you agree. That is my criticism of your world view. I did not straw man, you are actively explain how a group of p

More ›