Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Levitz
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
121.
▲
by
Levitz
5mo ago
Calling out the GOP for imposing racism, sexism and ideology in a thread about US universities is certainly a choice.
122.
▲
by
Levitz
5mo ago
Claude, rewrite this diary entry as a new episode of my Pokemon x Megaman fanfic. Replace disagreements with scenes of steamy action and write the whole thing in iambic pentameter.
123.
▲
by
Levitz
5mo ago
Journaling is widely recognized as a positive for mental health I think?
124.
▲
by
Levitz
5mo ago
"Better" in the sense that it doesn't risk the problems the other does. My intention with that example was to make it clear I don't have a problem with people doing whatever, regardless of me liking it or not.
125.
▲
by
Levitz
5mo ago
>Better faith CoC people talk about freedom of association vs freedom of speech - if a platform doesn't like their oppponents, isn't it fine to ban them? Sure, but the problem here is far more insidious. By latching into delica
126.
▲
by
Levitz
5mo ago
Per the article, it's seemingly not? >Last year, the Iranian government passed legislation that made using, buying or selling Starlink devices punishable by up to two years in prison. The jail term for distributing or importing more
127.
▲
by
Levitz
5mo ago
>The effects of the tech giants encroachment of society and the stakes and gravity of the situation is so serious Regarding pollution ??? Completely preposterous.
128.
▲
by
Levitz
5mo ago
Let's go down that route. So a corporation pays 1000x of a normal ticket penalty, let's say it operates a humble fleet of 1000 cars. Do we really want to require this service to be a million times better? This would surely kill mo
129.
▲
by
Levitz
5mo ago
>I live in Spain, this year we had 4 derailments for a total of 48 deaths and 195 injured. Which, to be clear, is a considerable outlier. Highest since 2013 and about double the deaths and 4x the injured of a "normal" year. Not
130.
▲
by
Levitz
5mo ago
The problem is this goodwill seemingly never works both ways. When the western side of things does something bad or controversial, it's all about how the west is bad and any comment on other actors is deflecting. When the eastern side
131.
▲
by
Levitz
5mo ago
It's not that the "Why it works" doesn't make sense to me, that's all logical, but how can anyone actually tell why it works? Isn't finding out why specifically an LLM does something pretty hard? Surely this ha
132.
▲
by
Levitz
5mo ago
You are insinuating that a fight against tech giants is the preferable option regarding pollution and I'm unserious??
133.
▲
by
Levitz
5mo ago
And I'm guessing that I'm supposed to believe here that the reason Bob hates explicitly this one company and is dismissing 99% of the damage done to the cute fluffy animal by corporations that seemingly get paid to exterminate t
134.
▲
by
Levitz
5mo ago
>This is a good place to put effort into stopping because it isn't yet entrenched Oh yeah, excellent place to put effort, it's not entrenched, it's just straight up against technological giants in a race that is considered
135.
▲
by
Levitz
5mo ago
Great news, you are free to stop using AI and to drink beer, and so are we all.
136.
▲
by
Levitz
5mo ago
It's not explicitly a great argument, but it's an excellent premise to set. Because this whole thing has absolutely nothing to do with pollution or water. It has to do with people hating AI and looking to portray it negatively. Th
137.
▲
by
Levitz
5mo ago
Every provider does this. There is no "neutral culture".
138.
▲
by
Levitz
5mo ago
Campism has taken root. The US is considered evil, China is the opposition, so it's good. Same as Venezuela, same as Iran. It doesn't matter if they are brutally oppressive regimes as long as they oppose the US.
139.
▲
by
Levitz
5mo ago
It's so amusing to see people despising Musk in the same breath that they declare support for a brutally authoritarian government.
140.
▲
by
Levitz
5mo ago
The person above explicitly mentions other models with no reference to their own screwups though.
141.
▲
by
Levitz
5mo ago
Kids that the population doesn't have will simply get imported from other countries. It has no impact.
142.
▲
by
Levitz
5mo ago
I don't see how any of this makes sense. >The #1 problem leading to humans not having enough to live comfortably is that we have an enormous number of humans and limited resources. Taking this as true (it very evidently isn't),
143.
▲
by
Levitz
5mo ago
Yeah, the US, which doesn't even want to put boots on the ground regarding Iran, will totally start invading nuclear powers in Europe any time now. Totally.
144.
▲
by
Levitz
5mo ago
If we are going to look outside the country for blame, China and Russia are right there. Not being able to trust US protection as much as in the past is evidently a terrible state of affairs, but this isn't the root of the problem.
145.
▲
by
Levitz
5mo ago
>check what US did with the TikTok. A specific case in which the US demanded a tiny fraction of what China does systematically, orders of magnitude worse. Okay. Didn't even take that into account to begin with but that's an eve
146.
▲
by
Levitz
5mo ago
Weird, why does China want GPUs then? Also, regarding that "tit for tat", how large of a "tat" is due, regarding decades of corporate espionage?
147.
▲
by
Levitz
5mo ago
Then you probably are not fit to comment on this matter. I'm sorry to be that blunt but if you don't understand the value of rule of law, the difference in incentives, the consequences of separation of powers, I can't even gr
148.
▲
by
Levitz
5mo ago
>but there is certainly a side that is extremely aggressive an can't conceive that others can have their own interests. And it's not the Chinese. It's not the Chinese? You sure? There's probably nobody more economical
149.
▲
by
Levitz
5mo ago
I don't think anyone is holding the US as blameless or perfect, but it gets exhausting to see Chinese propaganda every single time anything like this happens. When the US does something reprehensible, people rarely come up in droves
150.
▲
by
Levitz
5mo ago
>The subversion of language is sometimes poetic, sometimes just "play". ...And the vast majority of the time, activism. >Regardless, the fact that so much of this masc-biased website's energy is being sucked in on this
More ›