Levitz

11 ms·

151.
by Levitz 6mo ago
>The "Arduina" bit is clearly a joke How familiar are you with subversion of gendered language in feminist spaces? Calling it an "Arduina board" would not be out of the ordinary at all. Which, by the way, they would d
152.
by Levitz 6mo ago
>Outside of gay people, the rest is your projection: they are homogenous society, racial problems are nonexistent. You do know that Chinese people do go to other countries and that we all can see how insanely racist they can be right?
153.
by Levitz 6mo ago
In what universe does the US not have "meaningful private sphere"?
154.
by Levitz 6mo ago
If you are willing to be hyperbolic to this degree in the case of the US an equal description of China would make Nazi Germany blush.
155.
by Levitz 6mo ago
>Isn't the US building mass detention camps right now for all the brown people there? No, it is not, but the freedom of speech protections the US has (that China doesn't) allow for such commentary.
156.
by Levitz 6mo ago
Then what's the problem? Nobody needs it, nobody will use it, it will just die off.
157.
by Levitz 6mo ago
Same thing with the water arguments, or pollution in general. It's not about those having any weight, it's about being against AI first and building arguments against it second.
158.
by Levitz 6mo ago
...You think air conditioners are forbidden in Europe...?
159.
by Levitz 6mo ago
"It does X for you" is the point of many technologies. You still require knowledge to work around it. Context helps immensely, for example. Think of what you can do that someone outside tech can't.
160.
by Levitz 6mo ago
Will you guys update the site if what OP talks about ends up taking effect? I guess that at that point the domain name would be a bit out of place.
161.
by Levitz 6mo ago
Because the data it presents is not believable
162.
by Levitz 6mo ago
If this is their rationale they should say so, so they can fade into obscurity as soon as possible and leave room for sensible people.
163.
by Levitz 6mo ago
>By that logic they should be printing memos and dumping them in the Hudson, in case some of the people swimming there want to read them. And if it costed as much as posting on X, they should. >In either case, they're making this
164.
by Levitz 6mo ago
Literally nobody that takes this stance around X has or should have political relevancy to begin with though.
165.
by Levitz 6mo ago
>This is not true at all, and it's a silly statement. X isn't mainstream anymore, and the people who think it is are simply stuck in a bubble Used by 20% of adults, of course it's mainstream, everyone knows what it is, it
166.
by Levitz 6mo ago
Probably not, but then go ahead and say it. The problem is they can't really say it, because if their stance is that Musk's management deserves such rejection, then they are cutting their nose to spite their face, and if the abhor
167.
by Levitz 6mo ago
And yet, no game has problems selling due to these reactions. As a matter of fact, the vast majority of people can't even tell if AI has been used here or there unless told. I reckon it's just drama paraded by gaming "journal
168.
by Levitz 6mo ago
"Literally everyone" can't even agree on whether Polio is bad. I myself would disagree that CGI itself is a bad thing.
169.
by Levitz 6mo ago
Reddit? Or this site? Sort of? Some people voted for my comment, that surely means that I'm right about something, rather than them just liking it, right?
170.
by Levitz 6mo ago
I presume wasps are conscious. I still don't trust wasps.
171.
by Levitz 7mo ago
>That said, I agree with you that there's less-and-less gaming lock-in on windows, but that's because the majority of gamers are gaming on iOS and android. I don't think you are aware of how much the landscape has changed
172.
by Levitz 7mo ago
I mean, yes? You can give whatever weight you want to the whole thing, but the core issue with Hillary Clinton and the emails was that she was storing material on a private server rather than in official infrastructure. If Patel didn't
173.
by Levitz 7mo ago
It is relevant because if the vast, vast majority of repos have 2 or less stars then it's not that weird that a great deal of repos linked are, too, 2 or less stars.
174.
by Levitz 7mo ago
Removing friction from a process that damages privacy is not a positive.
175.
by Levitz 7mo ago
A whole lot of websites are inaccessible from my country when there's football on, due to a judicial order meant to curb piracy. The whole deal with Chat Control is also not to be forgotten. I do think you guys see this place with rose
176.
by Levitz 7mo ago
And what would those values and priorities be? Because it doesn't seem to me that they align with what they actually do. For example, it seems to me there is a whole lot of worry around megacorporations, often related to capitalism and
177.
by Levitz 7mo ago
4chan is and has for a long time been in cooperation with US law enforcement. You can literally, right now, enter the site and when reporting a post there's an option to report a post as breaking US law. If the UK is not happy about ho
178.
by Levitz 7mo ago
It's not the first time I see comments similar to this and I honestly can't even begin to grasp how anyone can think that the US is in any way shape or form at risk from Iran .
179.
by Levitz 7mo ago
I think you are right on every point, but I think it's worth noting that WoW is kind of a different beast. You don't play a "match", you don't play "against" other players most of the time, in this context
180.
by Levitz 7mo ago
>The real problem is that most people don’t want to let go of the very thing that is the problem: anonymity. Anonymity is not the problem though. We've gone with anonymity for a long while and it has worked fine. Would a removal of

More ›