Lerc

31 ms·

631.
by Lerc 8mo ago
What would be an acceptable amount of energy to spend on something that someone has done in a different manner before? Would you rather we stick with all of the current known ways to do things. Does this boil down to a condemnation of all
632.
by Lerc 8mo ago
I don't think many are doubting that. I'm not talking about the way things should be. I'm talking about the way they are .
633.
by Lerc 8mo ago
It's whatever what the people who have the power want to call it. What is written on a piece of paper is irrelevant if it is not acted upon. If the rename gets struck down then they don't have the power. If it doesn't they
634.
by Lerc 8mo ago
Dot product of opinions? Using a fancier term for the same thing might be a significant axis though.
635.
by Lerc 8mo ago
Information leaks everywhere, as the ability to process it increases, I think ultimately it will lead to a world where there are no secrets, provided one has the resources and intention to look for something. For a few years now I have been
636.
by Lerc 8mo ago
I have been playing around with something like this. I'm not going for compatibility, but something that is a bit hackable. Deliberately not having /lib /share and /etc to avoid confusion that it might be posix On neocot
637.
by Lerc 8mo ago
I'm not fond of this trend of stating a position and attributing it to "a source familiar with the situation" It combines interpretation of meaning with ambiguity to allow the reporter to assert anything they want. The ambigu
638.
by Lerc 8mo ago
>Will people in 30 years look back to today and judge those who showed disdain for people who rely on AI to write for them? There are people are judging your character for using such terms today. Their existence is not in doubt. It is
639.
by Lerc 8mo ago
It's worth remembering that you can argue that the use of the word is acceptable now, but can you guarantee that in 30 years time the future world will agree with you to the extent that they let you hold a position of responsibility a
640.
by Lerc 8mo ago
It would be interesting to get the agents to write code to preprocess the logs and generate systems to analyse the outputs. Maybe they are already doing this? Are there logs of the model's thinking?
641.
by Lerc 8mo ago
I think the concept has value, but I think targeting today's LLMs like this is short sighted. It's making what is likely to be a permanent change to fix a temporary problem. I think the thing that would have value in the long term
642.
by Lerc 8mo ago
That makes sense because It's a relevance problem, not a reasoning problem. Adding the hint that it is a test implicitly says 'don't assume relevance' It is reading I want to X, the X'er is 50meters away, should I
643.
by Lerc 8mo ago
The idea is that you build the aircraft frame out of the battery. If you can get it to work (a big if) you get to subtract the weight of the old frame before you make calculate the pseudo-density,
644.
by Lerc 8mo ago
Visual presentation has been a weak point of AI generation for me. There isn't a lot of support for them seeing how a potential presentation might appear to a human. Models that take visual input seem more focused on identifying what
645.
by Lerc 8mo ago
Structural batteries were supposed to be the solution where the density wasn't so important. I don't really have a good understanding of the ration of fuel weight to structural weight in existing aircraft though.
646.
by Lerc 8mo ago
It would be interesting to compile to WASM to compare side by side for performance and accuracy.
647.
by Lerc 8mo ago
This come from using the words to try an achieve more than one thing at the same time. Grandiose assertions of ability have been shown to improve the ability of models, but ability is not the only dimension that they are being measured u
648.
by Lerc 8mo ago
This is more about low effort than AI. It also seems like a natural result of all of the people challenging the usefulness of AI. It motivates people to show what they have done with it. It stands to reason that the things that take less e
649.
by Lerc 8mo ago
Section 116 (2) A plaintiff is not entitled by virtue of this section to any damages or to any other pecuniary remedy, other than costs, if it is established that, at the time of the conversion or detention: (a) the defendant was not
650.
by Lerc 8mo ago
The licence? If it comes from a site claiming it was under a licence when it was not, the misdeed is done by the person who provided the version carrying the licence.
651.
by Lerc 8mo ago
If one were to grab a second hand (is there much of an ex-lease market?) mac. What is the sweet spot for performance,battery life, and Asahi support?
652.
by Lerc 8mo ago
I'm not making any claims of certaincy. I have not published any books making claims of harm. I have not gone on a tour of interviews the world over trying to build public opinion instead of building consensus that the information is
653.
by Lerc 8mo ago
You are saying that from our perspective. I don't think the argument that witches are not real would have gained you much ground back then. We don't have the years of analysis of what actually happened for things happening righ
654.
by Lerc 8mo ago
There lies much of the problem. Nobody in Salem wanted to be seen to stand up for witches. I have never had a Facebook account because I never liked what they do, but this 'evidence' against them seems like they are relying on the
655.
by Lerc 8mo ago
What a load of nonsense, they won't be producing a report in a third of the time only to have no-one read it. They'll spend the same amount of time and produce a report three times the length, which will then go unread.
656.
by Lerc 8mo ago
> research papers by competent people read very clearly with readable sentences, while those who are afraid that their content doesn't quite cut it, litter it with jargon, long complicated sentences, hoping that by making things har
657.
by Lerc 8mo ago
There was an episode of Orphan Black where they were going to impersonate a billionaire. The guy turns up in a suit and gets told, 'A billionaire, not a millionaire, go and put some shorts on'
658.
by Lerc 8mo ago
> When I last checked, of over 10k posts, it only uses a few dozen to calculate that score, so it is about as reliable as dowsing. A few samples are sufficient when the signal is strong enough. The time spent pie chart is definitely
659.
by Lerc 8mo ago
It's comparatively few really for instance yours comes out as Analytical 45%, Cynical 30%, Pedantic 15%, Melancholic 10% and mine is Philosophical 35%, Hardware-Obsessed 25%, Analytically Pedantic 20%, Retro-Nostalgic 15%,
660.
by Lerc 8mo ago
Um, what? Are you interpreting scaling to mean adding parameters and nothing else? I'm not entirely sure where you get your confidence that we've past the ideal model size from, but at least that's a clear prediction so you

More ›