Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
LeafItAlone
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
91.
▲
by
LeafItAlone
1y ago
The catfish effect refers to private enterprise competing against state enterprise. In the case of airports, the options are an extremely limited number of private enterprises chosen by the state. Not the same thing.
92.
▲
by
LeafItAlone
1y ago
>but having basically all chip manufacturing in Asia is not a good idea if you think there'll be a war with China in the next few decades. I see this a lot, but I’m not smart enough to understand it. The US still has immense militar
93.
▲
by
LeafItAlone
1y ago
Which major airports in the United States are not owned at least partially by a government body?
94.
▲
by
LeafItAlone
1y ago
> As a free-market worshipper Free market in a location owned by the government where the government gets to control who the vendors are and what the customers are allowed to bring in? Thats not a free market to begin with.
95.
▲
by
LeafItAlone
1y ago
>If you travel every week for work, I would be booking full fare (refundable), not non-basic restricted fares. Why? I don’t fly that much, especially for work, and I’ve never had a problem getting to use my credits from cancelling flight
96.
▲
by
LeafItAlone
1y ago
I use an iPhone. 1. I’m always going to have a case on my phone, so I don’t care about the camera bump. 2. You’re correct here. I mostly don’t care, but I want to have different hidden folders, which iOS doesn’t natively have. Otherwise I d
97.
▲
by
LeafItAlone
1y ago
> Can't wait for more less-moderated open weight Chinese frontier models to liberate us from this garbage. Never would I have thought this sentence would be uttered. A Chinese product that is chosen to be less censored?
98.
▲
by
LeafItAlone
1y ago
> even if someone is simple minded or mentally unwell enough to think that current LLMs are conscious If you don’t think that this describes at least half of the non-tech-industry population, you need to talk to more people. Even amongst
99.
▲
by
LeafItAlone
1y ago
None of those sources detail anything that I would describe as “two large bombs”. And I can’t find a 72 hour power outage in Seattle in 2020. Can you help me out? mrangle also later said [0] they live “in a major city between Boston and DC”
100.
▲
by
LeafItAlone
1y ago
Those other commenters are talking about named cities which the rest of us are able to verify what they say based on simple internet searches. You are describing an unnamed war-torn hellscape that matches no city in America. It’s like somet
101.
▲
by
LeafItAlone
1y ago
>The nine months of rioting in 2020 were nine months of partisan terrorism purposefully leading exactly up to an election. Funny that, in the context of those so concerned with democracy. >We were terrorized, absolutely. It caused me
102.
▲
by
LeafItAlone
1y ago
Thanks for the heads up. I’ll check it out! I don’t visit Twitter links. Why not a link to the GitHub changelog? Also, as an aside since you are on the team - the organization verification is frustrating in that the docs indicate: >You m
103.
▲
by
LeafItAlone
1y ago
It’s also weird because all it took to bypass was this was enabling Web Search and it reproduced them in full. Maybe they see that as putting the blame on the sources they cite?
104.
▲
by
LeafItAlone
1y ago
I find the Codex CLI to be the worst of the CLI tools I’ve used (including, but not limited to, Claude Code, Gemini, Aider). There’s something about it that makes it clunky. Haven’t tried Cursor CLI yet though.
105.
▲
by
LeafItAlone
1y ago
Wouldn’t that only help the “big guys” who can afford to pay the tax?
106.
▲
by
LeafItAlone
1y ago
>the models are "good enough" at coding What models have you been using? None of the popular public ones are even close to “good enough” for me. They still surprise me and have value, but are not good enough.
107.
▲
by
LeafItAlone
1y ago
“guys” is gendered but is very often used to mean a general group. >given the prevalence of women in HR, that wording would actually have more chances of having a sexist background to it. The reason there are more women than men in HR is
108.
▲
by
LeafItAlone
1y ago
> Imagine if the laws of our country hung on the thread of a single line of PHP. I suspect we’ll be finding out in the next 3.5 years if they have even that strength.
109.
▲
by
LeafItAlone
1y ago
>The fast follower didn't have the release sitting in a safe so much as they rushed it out the door when prompted There’s the third option which is a combination of the two. They have something worthy of release, but spend the time
110.
▲
by
LeafItAlone
1y ago
~80% of software developers are male. [1] I’m not sure the percentage of companies that use software for highlighting candidates, but Anthropic almost certainly does and this [2] source says 75+% do. So since men wrote the software that did
111.
▲
by
LeafItAlone
1y ago
>spotted by clueless ladies working there Why the need for the sexist addition of ladies? People of all sexes and genders in HR can be clueless.
112.
▲
by
LeafItAlone
1y ago
Maybe. That could be true. But doesn’t happen the same with other tools. I’ll give the same exact prompt to all of LLMs I have access to and look at the responses for the best one. Grok is consistently the worst. So if it’s garbage in, ga
113.
▲
by
LeafItAlone
1y ago
> It’s just bizarrely uncompetitive with o3-pro and Grok 4 Heavy. In my experience Grok 4 and 4 Heavy have been crap. Who cares how many requests you get with it when the response is terrible. Worst LLM money I’ve spent this year and I’v
114.
▲
by
LeafItAlone
1y ago
>Are there still customers giving tips as "a reward for good service"? As in any tip at all? No, from me. I don’t think I’ve never _not_ tipped when the situation expects it (sit down restaurant being served). I know the person
115.
▲
by
LeafItAlone
1y ago
>Democracy depends on voters getting what they voted for. That only works if each vote has the same worth in the election and governing. Otherwise the whole population might be getting something that only a small number voted. Do you thi
116.
▲
by
LeafItAlone
1y ago
I believe it. Maybe not replace 100%, but effectively replace it. I believe that at some point, AI will get good enough that most companies will eventually stop hiring someone that doesn’t utilize AI. Because most companies are just making
117.
▲
by
LeafItAlone
1y ago
To get more people using it, and more. I’ve encountered people who don’t use it because they think that it isn’t something that will help them, even in tech. Showing how different groups find value in it might get people in those same posit
118.
▲
by
LeafItAlone
1y ago
The best way I’ve found to interact with it is to treat it like an overly eager junior developer who just read books like Gang of Four and feels the need to prove their worth as a senior. Explain that simplicity matters, or you have an exis
119.
▲
by
LeafItAlone
1y ago
Consider yourself lucky if you’ve never had a co-worker do something along those lines. At this point seeing a person something like that wouldn’t even phase me.
120.
▲
by
LeafItAlone
1y ago
>You can't just run several tasks in parallel hoping for one of them to complete. Not only can you, some providers recommend it and their tools provide it, like ChatGPT Codex (the web tool). Can’t find where I read it but I’m pretty
More ›