LaurieCheers

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by LaurieCheers 19y ago

   I thought you handled it pretty well. Basically, you wrote a big sign saying "here is the bike shed", to make sure bike-shed commenters had something to occupy them. :)
2. 2.▲
   by LaurieCheers 19y ago

   I think Paul's logic here is subtly backwards... "It doesn't matter much where a given individual went to college." From Y-Combinator's perspective, yes, I'm sure that's true. The people they're looking at are self-selected, and pretty much
3. 3.▲
   by LaurieCheers 19y ago

   "LOL I CAN HAS" is the new "is the new".
4. 4.▲
   by LaurieCheers 19y ago

   Fair comment. Frankly, I wasn't sure if it was on-topic either; let the collective decide. :)
5. 5.▲
   by LaurieCheers 19y ago

   To stop people trying to game the system, ratings of articles probably shouldn't be visible.
6. 6.▲
   The nerdiest nerd test around(students.washington.edu)

   1 points by LaurieCheers 19y ago|5 comments
7. 7.▲
   by LaurieCheers 19y ago

   Interesting. So can you increase your voting power by simply upvoting stories that are already popular? Or does the system favour people who upvote good articles _before_ they become popular? By the way, I don't bother upvoting articles tha
8. 8.▲
   by LaurieCheers 19y ago

   > It's also possible that there would be logistical > problems in creating layer upon layer of simulations. > There might not be enough computing power to continue > the simulation if billions of inhabitants of a virtual &#