Lascaille

12 ms·

61.
by Lascaille 5y ago
It's to do with social media, and the internet in general.
62.
by Lascaille 5y ago
>I read his blog sometimes and all too often come away feeling disgusted. The comments sections are all echo chambers and his dialog on certain sociopolitical issues (recently, vaccine passports) is nothing short of fascist. I used to re
63.
by Lascaille 5y ago
That just encourages trouble. The most experienced editors are also the most likely editors to be surreptitiously on the payroll of some PR firm. That's creating an environment where those editors can edit articles on the basis of pape
64.
by Lascaille 5y ago
The adoption was probably pushed through the church and it's a 'if you leave the church you have to give the kid back' sort of deal. Just a hunch.
65.
by Lascaille 5y ago
>Clearly you have not considered the scale they operate in. Youtube literally operates walk-in 'creator spaces' where creators with popular channels can go to make use of editing equipment and resources. They can staff a media
66.
by Lascaille 5y ago
Having an opinion - which you can justify vaguely logically - about subjective matters and sharing it isn't 'spreading misinformation.' There's a very toxic current of censorship spreading which involves redefining opini
67.
by Lascaille 5y ago
>The conclusions/solutions drawn in the article seem to not match up with the data presented. It's Vox.
68.
by Lascaille 5y ago
Maybe go be a fascist somewhere else?
69.
by Lascaille 5y ago
>It’s a lot of misinformation. It's only 'misinformation' if you take the words of random people on the internet as being 'information' instead of 'opinion.' As that's a very foolish thing to do I
70.
by Lascaille 5y ago
There was an incident with a whistleblower - a CNN reporter - recorded in a restaurant relating how there'd be a narrative line passed down from the top every day. You'll have to dig it up as I can't remember the guy's n
71.
by Lascaille 5y ago
>wonder if the media malfeasance is more than mere laziness Of course it is. The modern media is absurdly woke and out of touch with reality and pretty much without principle either. The trucker convoy was a perfect example of a modern w
72.
by Lascaille 5y ago
>A source from you would be great Much like you sourced your claim that transferwise worked? No thanks, I'll save my time.
73.
by Lascaille 5y ago
>The only hope the pro-Trump faction had (and a slim hope at that) was to peacefully pressure Mike Pence into refusing to count the ballots from contested states. Which would potentially or eventually lead to the team they supported (Tea
74.
by Lascaille 5y ago
It's really weird how from my defence of peaceful protest you've totally pigeonholed me and are now diverging onto BLM and Jan 6. It's weird. >their own tribe This is the problem in your thinking. These 'tribes'
75.
by Lascaille 5y ago
>Western Union and Moneygram exists in Russia no? What aspect of 'sanctions' do you not understand? Edit: Oh, I read your other contributions in this thread and see you're just trolling. My mistake.
76.
by Lascaille 5y ago
Rate limiting based on account credentials is a solution to having tons of users connecting from one IP address...
77.
by Lascaille 5y ago
>Or are you actually suggesting that it is okay to hold the public hostage until you get what you want? Ghandi and MLK have already given us the answer to that question. It's fine to peacefully protest until you achieve your objecti
78.
by Lascaille 5y ago
>there's also an article about it from the BBC Note that the byline of that article is 'world service disinformation team.'
79.
by Lascaille 5y ago
>What bias do you think CNN has? CNN was openly anti-Trump for the entire administration, as in, instructions were literally passed down that reporting should be slanted in such a way as to taint him. It isn't a case of having to
80.
by Lascaille 5y ago
>But it is really interesting to note how difficult it was to restart the conversation once the lab leak theory was "debunked" Modern journalists are used to observing social media to determine and reinforce trends. When someth
81.
by Lascaille 5y ago
>The justification for NaN not being equal to themselves is just bonk. It makes a lot of sense to me. NaN indicates data has been lost. You did something and you stored the result in a number datatype but the result isn't a number.
82.
by Lascaille 5y ago
>many people will possibly agree that this problem exists >a reliable way to measure whether it actually improves things After the process has been carried out, it is measured as successful if less people agree the problem exists. Ver
83.
by Lascaille 5y ago
>This is a good example of an amazingly bad article with the worst type of wiki lawyering on the talk page. >absolutely no reason other than some editors going all "nuh uh" They're almost certainly paid to keep that con
84.
by Lascaille 5y ago
This seems to be the general case for user-contributed sites. People who are fans of a subject (be it football or model trains) may consistently use such sites but generally aren't invested enough to create content or do much beyond ar
85.
by Lascaille 5y ago
>Disregard solar power Wires exist
86.
by Lascaille 5y ago
>stressed me most was the unexpected extent of polarized alarmism all over Reddit Reddit is a website mostly consumed and curated by people who have anxiety disorders, it seems. There's just nothing healthy on any of the major subre
87.
by Lascaille 5y ago
>Why do you believe this? It's literally their written policy and has been enforced multiple times. App store and GPlay apps have to adhere to Apple/Google set content standards. You can't host 'free speech' apps
88.
by Lascaille 5y ago
Wikipedia articles about partisan US politics are often incorrect.
89.
by Lascaille 5y ago
Myths are hugely effective in wartime. It's a phenomenon literally called a ghost and you're seriously saying 'but there's no proof???'
90.
by Lascaille 5y ago
You pick something comfy.

More ›