>This is a good example of an amazingly bad article with the worst type of wiki lawyering on the talk page. >absolutely no reason other than some editors going

>This is a good example of an amazingly bad article with the worst type of wiki lawyering on the talk page. >absolutely no reason other than some editors going all "nuh uh" They're almost certainly paid to keep that content on the talk page and off the article. Once you're in the partisan politics bubble normal procedures and safeguards break down because there are absurd amounts of money being spent. I looked at that talk page and it's just painful. "It isn't his laptop" "It isn't not proven to be not his laptop" "Even if it is his laptop, it isn't his files" "It isn't not proven to be not his files" Just admit that it could be genuine or it could be a disinfo campaign. Ugh.