La1n

32 ms·

1. 331.▲
   by La1n 7y ago

   So it was a neo-nazi platform, just not exclusively.
2. 332.▲
   by La1n 7y ago

   You know the second part you are quoting isn't actually published by the EU? It's published by two people who got funding by the EU. This program supports many things in the domain of Rights, Equality and Citizenship, including; A
3. 333.▲
   by La1n 7y ago

   But legally they are two different things. Just because you feel it's a subset of hate speech that doesn't mean it is. In a lot of countries with hate speech laws, but no blasphemy laws, this would be allowed. She did not say anyt
4. 334.▲
   by La1n 7y ago

   I know there are quite a few European countries with laws against hate speech, I was mostly referring to the following two parts: >defined essentially as any form of discrimination whatsoever >has been made illegal in Europe following
5. 335.▲
   by La1n 7y ago

   >"Hate Speech", defined essentially as any form of discrimination whatsoever, has been made illegal in Europe following the growth of the anti-immigration far right. Source? This is not true in my experience.
6. 336.▲
   by La1n 7y ago

   Google in this case https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/feb/18/the-right...
7. 337.▲
   by La1n 7y ago

   I would not cry over companies going bankrupt that sell products that I need to see ads for to realise I need or want them. Not every single company would go bust for many businesses provide things people need or want without having been ex
8. 338.▲
   by La1n 7y ago

   These "root events" might just as well be a justification for pre-existing racism.
9. 339.▲
   by La1n 7y ago

   Exactly, people act like restricting access (or in this case voluntarily not storing something) will also remove all the surrounding information about it. I didn't need to read pro-slavery propaganda to know slavery is bad, and I didn&
10. 340.▲
    by La1n 7y ago

    Do you have a source for that, I can't seem to find a reliable one
11. 341.▲
    by La1n 7y ago

    In this case their "truth" is violence. The thing being censored is them advocating violence...
12. 342.▲
    by La1n 7y ago

    A moral duty is still a duty even if you are not obligated by law to do it. Edit: Most definitions of duty definitely include moral and lawful duty.
13. 343.▲
    by La1n 7y ago

    It is being tested and it's not a "dangerous, untested new derivative", it's a enantiomer of ketamine, it's literally 50% of the molecules in ketamine. And why don't we just use normal ketamine, why test any ne
14. 344.▲
    by La1n 7y ago

    Also, the fine (if we are talking about the Danish one) was not for collecting a phone number. It was for retaining it after the retention limit (in this case 2 years, and they kept them for 5 years) without a good cause. The company argued
15. 345.▲
    by La1n 8y ago

    You keep saying millions of dollars will have been wasted. However consider an other option where it turns out to be a problem with more airplanes and hundreds of of lives 'will be wasted'. Some countries take a more precautionary
16. 346.▲
    by La1n 8y ago

    I wouldn't say it was picked at random when there is little information available. It seems to me like an application of the precautionary principle. In this case there is a plausible risk that the problem extents to other 737 MAX airp
17. 347.▲
    by La1n 10y ago

    This is mostly due to malnutrition and not calorie restriction as far as I know. Calorie restriction has many positive health effects. Even then, comparing overweight people to famine struck people is an unfair comparison, it's like co