LUmBULtERA

4 ms·

1.
by LUmBULtERA 12d ago
Things are or were labeled wrong... I clicked a button for "upgrade to iOS 27" but then follow up dialogue is talking about upgrading to 26.7. When supposedly I'm already running 26.7. It's very weird.
2.
by LUmBULtERA 12d ago
Anyone else accidentally upgrade to 26.7 first?
3.
by LUmBULtERA 15d ago
Yes, I'm wondering why it's upvoted like this is something new today. What's going on?
4.
by LUmBULtERA 17d ago
My 15 pro bought on release is at 91% and 607 cycles, for more reference.
5.
by LUmBULtERA 18d ago
Just an FYI, despite the wording on this, my "don't train on this" checkbox never changes (I don't need to re-toggle it, or change it on every device, etc...). This post reads as if its something that needs to be done r
6.
by LUmBULtERA 1mo ago
How is that the case? ChatGPT not only gives a lot of Codex/Agentic usage, once you've run out of that you still have a massive quota of Chat usage that's entirely separate. You can still use plug-ins with Github, Google Dri
7.
by LUmBULtERA 2mo ago
I'm still not sure, there's a promo going on now, but generally Go gives $60 of API credit and right now it might be $120 with deepseek. But $20/month OpenAI subscription I believe gives you many hundreds of API-equivalent u
8.
by LUmBULtERA 2mo ago
Is it still cheaper than Luna if using an OpenAI subscription? My gut is no, but I have not done the math.
9.
by LUmBULtERA 2mo ago
>They need to slow down and do a model release once a year and only do extremely minor iterations instead. There are a ton of use-cases where the models still struggle a lot and make bad decisions, I'd much prefer they continue thei
10.
by LUmBULtERA 2mo ago
I have friends and family who use Gemini, but entirely because their Pixel phones came with a year of it for free. No other reason, and they will most likely never pay for it.
11.
by LUmBULtERA 2mo ago
The subsidizing thing is repeated over and over without proof. Personally, I doubt they're actually subsidized.
12.
by LUmBULtERA 2mo ago
Maybe, but Tibo said something on Twitter last week making it sound like it might not be.
13.
by LUmBULtERA 2mo ago
Given how OpenAI got rid of their 5-hour limits and reset weekly limits so often, is Kimi really undercutting them on effective price?
14.
by LUmBULtERA 2mo ago
Sure, but at those API rates it doesn't beat the subscription plans for OpenAI.
15.
by LUmBULtERA 3mo ago
Literally no UI changes when I toggle between the two. It's 100% identical, one is not less technical than the other.
16.
by LUmBULtERA 3mo ago
>Also, when you toggle btween ChatGPT Work and ChatGPT Codex, nothing changes. This is super confusing. This is the weirdest thing. It's completely unclear even if I was using the app for "work" rather than "coding&q
17.
by LUmBULtERA 3mo ago
>They mean the same thing as GPT-5.6-Max, GPT-5.6-Plus, and GPT-5.6-Fast but require base knowledge for an analogy. But do they though? When do you use GPT-5.6-Max-Low vs. GPT-5.6-Plus High? Or GPT-5.6-Fast-Xhigh? What's the Pareto
18.
by LUmBULtERA 3mo ago
Ping ponging to ChatGPT/Codex for 5.6 launch to test that out... Hopefully its out today or soon.
19.
by LUmBULtERA 3mo ago
There could be a whole host of reasons. It may be during launch that compute is re-allocated from training to inference so that all users can try Fable. Soon that compute will re-allocate back to training until they can get more compute.
20.
by LUmBULtERA 3mo ago
Huh, super interesting. Thanks!
21.
by LUmBULtERA 3mo ago
Did Anthropic have Opus 4.8 and Sonnet 5 switched in the Agentic Search chart at first?
22.
by LUmBULtERA 3mo ago
That's yet to be determined. I think a lot of open-weight models are benchmaxxed and their usefulness for many tasks are not represented by those.
23.
by LUmBULtERA 3mo ago
Fair to include A&G, but their marketing and training cost is about generating future growth. People say that the subscriptions are highly subsidized as if its fact -- it's certainly not a well-established fact. These people simpl
24.
by LUmBULtERA 3mo ago
The craftsman, who may otherwise be profitable, also has investment costs that cause them to show a loss for some time.
25.
by LUmBULtERA 3mo ago
Day 2 the craftsman has not made up for the investment/loss of their equipment. Not a useful example.
26.
by LUmBULtERA 3mo ago
OpenAI inference revenue exceeds its cost of inference by a good margin in 2025 ( https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/opena... )
27.
by LUmBULtERA 3mo ago
Data from OpenAI shows their 2025 inference revenue exceeded their cost of inference by a good margin ( https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/opena... ). Saying this is being subsidized i
28.
by LUmBULtERA 3mo ago
The API inference cost to customers is not the actual cost of providing inference, and the cost of providing API inference need not be the cost of providing subscriber inference.
29.
by LUmBULtERA 3mo ago
The API inference cost to customers is not the actual cost of providing inference, and the cost of providing API inference need not be the cost of providing subscriber inference.
30.
by LUmBULtERA 3mo ago
My comment is about your statement "serving these tokens without paying for training is already expensive"... One thing we do know from OpenAI's leaked financial document is that they are already profitable on inference, thou

More ›