LPisGood

13 ms·

271.
by LPisGood 5mo ago
You don’t need to be sneaky. Just require all contributing PRs to say openclaw.
272.
by LPisGood 5mo ago
They’re also objectively not “unable” they are “unwilling” and hiding behind policies as if they are unalterable laws is silly.
273.
by LPisGood 5mo ago
How would you fire an agent? This impacts the company that makes the LLM, but not the agent itself.
274.
by LPisGood 5mo ago
Some Erdős problems are basically trivial using sophisticated techniques that were developed later. I remember one of my professors, a coauthor of Erdős boasted to us after a quiz how proud he was that he was able to assign an Erdős proble
275.
by LPisGood 6mo ago
I think they would have a very strong case that using the mouse on a product is likely to confuse consumers about the origin of the product and therefore infringe on their trademark.
276.
by LPisGood 6mo ago
> Marvin Minsky "proved" that there was no way a perceptron-based network could do anything interesting What result are you referring to?
277.
by LPisGood 6mo ago
When attackers can move laterally through everything because every internal tool leaks credentials and data there will be issues.
278.
by LPisGood 6mo ago
There is something to be said about scope creep here
279.
by LPisGood 6mo ago
I think he plans to go far beyond just making RAM in that clean room. This is pure speculation, but I suspect the goal of that channel is to just make doom from scratch. Given that the shed in this guy’s backyard is already approaching the
280.
by LPisGood 6mo ago
I saw this video yesterday and considered posting it, but I wasn’t sure if it was appropriate for HN. This channel has another video where it shows how the clean room lab is created starting from a basic backyard shed, and that was truly as
281.
by LPisGood 6mo ago
So what’s the point of having portable syntax, but not portable semantics?
282.
by LPisGood 6mo ago
It certainly does. But so too do complex neural network functions, as do attention mechanisms.
283.
by LPisGood 6mo ago
Yeah, but they’re not magic; we can still do experiments and see what happens. Anthropic did a lot of work on this and showed that they’re not accurately describing their reasoning process.
284.
by LPisGood 6mo ago
The thing is that they are completely incapable of meta-cognition. Reasoning models don’t show their actual reasoning at all.
285.
by LPisGood 6mo ago
How much revenue to users actually see?
286.
by LPisGood 6mo ago
My question is why did you have to design this to use an MDM instead of a simple program running in the terminal or something?
287.
by LPisGood 6mo ago
I use them as likes
288.
by LPisGood 6mo ago
I feel like people said the same thing about Apple for years.
289.
by LPisGood 7mo ago
“Depressant” refers to its impacts on nervous system activity, not that it causes feelings of depression.
290.
by LPisGood 7mo ago
If tweets were a leading cause of death in children we should probably at least consider making it harder to tweet.
291.
by LPisGood 7mo ago
Australia de-armed pretty successfully.
292.
by LPisGood 7mo ago
There are many branch prediction algorithms out there. They range from fun architecture papers that try to use machine learning to static predictors that don’t even adapt to the prior outcomes at all.
293.
by LPisGood 7mo ago
We’ve seen other highly developed countries operate just fine without arming their citizenry to the teeth.
294.
by LPisGood 7mo ago
It seems your question largely boils down to: “why do anything when AI could do it instead?” I think there are many answers to this, not the least of which is that AI can’t really do it instead.
295.
by LPisGood 7mo ago
I’m not usually one to complain about AI being used to generate content because I find this an especially interesting topic, but it really took me out of it. More relevant to the topic at hand, I feel like I didn’t put that much thought int
296.
by LPisGood 7mo ago
> If we end up in a place where the craft truly is dead, then congratulations, your value probably just dropped to zero I think, then that the value of all knowledge work will have dropped to zero. Software engineering is, to my mind, “i
297.
by LPisGood 7mo ago
60% is pretty well in “falling off a cliff” territory. The graph is misleading but that phrase, to me, is not.
298.
by LPisGood 7mo ago
Can you elaborate what you mean? Are you referring to a paradigm where people make their systems less secure in the effort to make them more secure?
299.
by LPisGood 7mo ago
I think a big part of this is the RISC vs ARM architecture, unless RISC has improved more than I know in this area
300.
by LPisGood 7mo ago
I was thinking about this in recent weeks and I think I’ve actually changed my mind on it. It’s not really possible to measure how much it would cost to not have a meeting, and I think it’s pretty obvious that if there were no meetings ever

More ›