LHxB

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by LHxB 8y ago

   This reminds me of Dürrenmatt's "Die Physiker "( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Physicists ). While this has indeed very scary implications, one should be aware that if it's thinkable, eventually i
2. 2.▲
   by LHxB 8y ago

   I tried this at some points where I often have to allocate dynamic memory though I knew an upper bound (no static size, though). Got some nice (and easy) extra performance, thank you (and the others who replied to my comment) very much for
3. 3.▲
   by LHxB 8y ago

   Maybe in a logarithmic plot this would look differently, but it seems to me that std::vector performs quite well in particular for few elements. So why would I bother with smallVector if simple std::vector is on par in their (supposed) prim
4. 4.▲
   by LHxB 8y ago

   13 minutes -> 11 minutes: "Elapsed time goes down by 15%." 3:16 minutes -> 1:42 minutes: "We get a roughly 90% speedup in elapsed time." What's the formula for the "speedup"? I think it would be more
5. 5.▲
   by LHxB 10y ago

   Is someone aware of a similiar post replacing "Physics" with "Computer Science"?