KrautFox

30 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by KrautFox 2y ago

   Thank you for your answer, you have a valid point in both things not necessarily being mutually exclusive. I am just scared of what happens if no precautions are taken before we proceed with extending our life expectancy. I don't know
2. 2.▲
   by KrautFox 2y ago

   "People die of cancer and other diseases everyday, and you considered it selfish to want to live? What about the impact on loved ones like children or parents?" Not dying due to cancer at 20 and living to be 400 years old isn&#x27
3. 3.▲
   by KrautFox 2y ago

   How is that a valid comparison?
4. 4.▲
   by KrautFox 2y ago

   Maybe i didn't communicate well enough what i am trying to say: I don't see how it would improve life overall, except for duration. I see many areas where life would become worse because of it, so i am biased, true. But your scena
5. 5.▲
   by KrautFox 2y ago

   Hi, This is a human centric approach, which i don't subscribe to. I am not of the opinion that every human life needs saving as it is the most valuable thing there is, as i don't think it is, my own life included. I will eventuall
6. 6.▲
   by KrautFox 2y ago

   I don't wanna be a buzzkill but: I don't see how living (potentially) forever is anything but a horrible, horrible ego driven idea with 0 rational thought put behind it, you may enlighten me here: - Unlimited human life expectancy