Krasnol

32 ms·

481.
by Krasnol 3y ago
> It's just as bad as if george soros was paying for the ads. Now I see where you're coming from and why you're offended. I'd lie if I'd say that I'm surprised.
482.
by Krasnol 3y ago
I haven't seen a single one of them. I don't have a Facebook account and even if I had, they seem not to run them in Germany.
483.
by Krasnol 3y ago
Sure there are "several" people who don't like it. Especially if they or their political representatives are being ridiculed by him. It's hardly a relevant group here, especially because the article points out the actual
484.
by Krasnol 3y ago
Adding to my previous comment: I've taken Poland as an example. You can see the Ads here: https://www.facebook.com/ads/library/?active_status=all&ad_t... With which of those do you actually have a problem
485.
by Krasnol 3y ago
> First, what does the EU have to advertise that needs more promotion than even local politicians do? Many things actually since most people know not enough about what, why or how they do things. See my billboard example. > Second, th
486.
by Krasnol 3y ago
I paste into address bar to remove formatting etc.
487.
by Krasnol 3y ago
So what? What's the problem with that? In several countries, they even put up billboards next to projects they paid for.
488.
by Krasnol 3y ago
I don't know where you are going, but I did fix several articles already and never had a single issue with it because my sources were correct. Yes, there might be bad actors, but it doesn't mean that everything is bad and impossib
489.
by Krasnol 3y ago
Did you fix it?
490.
by Krasnol 3y ago
How about: less drama? There are things where you can't trust "the EU" (whatever this is supposed to be, the Parliament? The Commission? The countries?) and there are things where you can and absolutely should. Generalization
491.
by Krasnol 3y ago
Yeah, I'm sure there is even some guy out there who talks to his grandmother using Telegram.
492.
by Krasnol 3y ago
Which are...where? Who does this? How is the spread of this compared to Telegram groups? Why do you keep on pushing for the wrong use case?
493.
by Krasnol 3y ago
There are no "public groups" in Signal. Don't know about Whatsapp since I don't have it anymore. All of my groups consist of people I know. You still don't understand the use case. > elegram knows your number and
494.
by Krasnol 3y ago
The whole thing is set up as a review: > USB-C head-to-head comparison > Apple’s new iPhone 15 marks a disruptive departure from previous models. The 11-year reign of the Lightning cable is over, and the USB-C era has begun — leaving
495.
by Krasnol 3y ago
Your group chats go into a black box unencrypted. You don't know what happens to it because it's not E2E. You also gave your phone number to this shady company who runs those servers which keep everything you wrote. Even Whatsapp
496.
by Krasnol 3y ago
Bringing up Telegram in this context makes it quite funny, since Telegram users seem not to care about the safety of the contents of their chats at all in this shady black box. Phone numbers are a quite ridiculously small problem compared t
497.
by Krasnol 3y ago
The fact that you had to switch over to my person says it all.
498.
by Krasnol 3y ago
Why didn't they make the post after they made this immense additional investment for more cables? Yeah...it's not useless for their and Apple's marketing department. For everybody else, it is.
499.
by Krasnol 3y ago
It's actually the perfect use case since everything is fake about ads already. What difference does it make if it's a heavily filtered human or some computer generated image?
500.
by Krasnol 3y ago
Their choice is remarkably ridiculous. It looks like they start at a 10 and then continue with 4, 3, 2. I wonder who paid for this...how is this even getting so many upvotes? It's pretty much useless.
501.
by Krasnol 3y ago
But it's not just Alice looking here. You can fix both problems at the same time. If you consider arguments by certain groups advocating for the fix of the problem, they aren't even the same groups.
502.
by Krasnol 3y ago
> Elections should reflect the will of the people. But it's kind of gamed, because lots of people don't vote. How does "not voting" not reflect the will of the people? They're not forced to not vote. It's th
503.
by Krasnol 3y ago
I'm using ublock Origin and have never seen any of those. For those with ubO who still see them, cleaning the cache and updating the filters within ubO seems to help. https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/a
504.
by Krasnol 3y ago
I don't understand. How would regulating guns make tracking less problematic? It's still a problem in societies which have gun regulations. You can murder someone without a gun, too. Stalking is there without guns too. Let's
505.
by Krasnol 3y ago
Thanks for being the one who provided some interesting to read on this topic here. I was confused, too. Thought my ublock blocked the rest of the post there...I wonder where the upvotes come from. Do people actually click the link?
506.
by Krasnol 3y ago
It was never 1 or 0. It's just the market pressure to generate even more every quarter. There are ways around this and ways to still generate profits. It's not like nobody was watching ads. It's not ever ENOUGH people to watc
507.
by Krasnol 3y ago
I wonder how long it takes until a different platform becomes more popular because of all this.
508.
by Krasnol 3y ago
Yeah, but in the end they are those who fuel the waste machine. They start it, and they are the reason why there are new phones every year. For no sane reason. Somewhere along the way, you pass a threshold where it's uncool to have a c
509.
by Krasnol 3y ago
In your first comment, you've stated that my statement that nuclear has been replaced by renewables is "false". I gave you sources which supported my statement and showed that you are wrong in accusing me of falsehood. You al
510.
by Krasnol 3y ago
I try to clear up your false statements with sources and facts. Meanwhile, you keep on stacking "opinions" without any facts even close to it.

More ›