Klonoar

6 ms·

91.
by Klonoar 4mo ago
Noted! I'll keep it in mind, it's a great suggestion.
92.
by Klonoar 4mo ago
You're throwing around the term "ossification" like it's a guarantee or necessity tied to anything being discussed here, and that's just not the case. Software developers should not ossify. Nowhere have I said that
93.
by Klonoar 4mo ago
> You're proposing software engineers need to protect themselves from something that's specific to their field when the problem is holistic. I have not said it's specific to their field. I've just been specifically
94.
by Klonoar 4mo ago
> Glad you got your nut and do not care how it shakes out. I do care, it's why I commented what I commented. ;P I already acknowledged that "caste" is an incorrect word choice and I could've done better there, but m
95.
by Klonoar 4mo ago
> It's in no way specific to software engineering as a role nor to high salary positions. Yes, I agree. We are, however, on a site and in a thread that is dedicated to the role of software engineering, so I don't really care
96.
by Klonoar 4mo ago
In hindsight, the word "caste" is too heavily loaded and I should have chosen a different term. Sorry for the shit choice. It's not meant to be taken negatively, and is purely a term that I was choosing to represent "hey
97.
by Klonoar 4mo ago
> It’s pretty much exactly what Americans decry about unions. If you consider a union to be a "bad thing" then we are likely going to talk past each other for eternity.
98.
by Klonoar 4mo ago
> Well, that's already the case because you cant just call yourself an engineer and start signing off on projects. It's a legally protected title in a lot of places. You need a professional license, and can face legal liabilit
99.
by Klonoar 4mo ago
Alright, I guess I'll take the bait. Not much else going on today anyway. > I’m pointing out what I believe to be ridiculous gatekeeping. I am not gatekeeping. I am stating that we collectively exist in a professional caste and th
100.
by Klonoar 4mo ago
> Fwiw, a non-technical employee in my workplace has begun submitting ai-generated prs to internal repos I maintain & they're of excellent quality, with review feedback graciously received & expediently addressed, so this i
101.
by Klonoar 5mo ago
Tauri is not even remotely an appropriate answer to this question.
102.
by Klonoar 5mo ago
In case it wasn't clear from my comment, I don't really care about the EV part: I view them as secondary cars for around town. They do not need ~300 miles of range or whatever. Nobody needs more than 134hp on the street with insta
103.
by Klonoar 5mo ago
In case it wasn't clear from my comment, I don't really care about the EV part: I view them as secondary cars for around town. They do not need ~300 miles of range or whatever.
104.
by Klonoar 5mo ago
This is the weird thing tho. Nobody, and I mean nobody, is looking at owning a Ferrari for “efficiency”. They are similar to Porsche where you’re looking for a driving feel, or for the badge. Ferrari releasing this feels like saying “our et
105.
by Klonoar 5mo ago
Amusingly, the eGolf that VW had to build as a compliance car is one of the better choices for “just give me a fucking car that’s an EV”. It’s literally the MK7 Golf R, but with AWD removed and a battery instead of an engine. Physical inter
106.
by Klonoar 5mo ago
> This hot take It is not a hot take. I lived in Japan for quite some number of years and I'm back there regularly for work and to see friends. I know what I am talking about. You live in Tokyo, you know damn well that you can rec
107.
by Klonoar 5mo ago
No shit. Do you really think this is an original comment to make?
108.
by Klonoar 5mo ago
Conbini meals only register as "high quality" to you because your comparison point (e.g, American 7-11) is an abysmal excuse for food. The food is, in reality, not that special.
109.
by Klonoar 5mo ago
Removing lactose from things is largely solved at this point. If you’re experiencing an unfortunate taste you should try a different brand; the Lactaid brand (which is what everyone seems to know of) isn’t great.
110.
by Klonoar 5mo ago
It’s not cynical, but it is overly consumerist. I cannot imagine having untold amounts of money only to do nothing afterwards except consume the stuff put in front of you.
111.
by Klonoar 5mo ago
Judging by the color of the text on your comment (currently downvoted gray), I think it's pretty clear how readers are taking it. I would encourage you to take a wider view of the problems in the UI ecosystem and why people make tradeo
112.
by Klonoar 5mo ago
> So now it's personal and I'm the bad guy It's not personal, but yes, you're being intentionally obtuse to OP's point. > and it's not an opinion or theory because I've proven it by shipping an ap
113.
by Klonoar 5mo ago
Also NSAttributedString would invoke WebKit under the hood if you went to render an HTML string.
114.
by Klonoar 5mo ago
Nothing comes for free, but OP’s entire point is that the price to pay for even halfway decent native markdown rendering is too high - and thus a reason why people often give up and go to Electron. They could not have made their point more
115.
by Klonoar 5mo ago
Yeah... people expect that when they copy chat messages. It's correct behavior.
116.
by Klonoar 5mo ago
sounds out of scope for an llm chat ui What? No. This is like building a Slack clone without the ability to copy a stream of messages. It is entirely reasonable to want to do this.
117.
by Klonoar 5mo ago
Didn’t GitHub add PR stacking recently…?
118.
by Klonoar 5mo ago
You should define “few years old”. One trick is to buy a car from the end of the 3G era, because at least in America those networks don’t even operate anymore. Car is nerfed in terms of phoning home without you having to do much at all.
119.
by Klonoar 5mo ago
You don’t speak for most of us.
120.
by Klonoar 5mo ago
Oh! Wasn’t this launcher as a response to Cartoon Orbit? I legit had forgotten all about this.

More ›