KingMob

23 ms·

241.
by KingMob 11mo ago
As they put it, it was less of an interpreter, and more like 3 regexes in a trench coat.
242.
by KingMob 11mo ago
> It’s starting to feel silly to demonize Google for doing security research at this point. Aren't most people here demonizing Google for dedicating the resources to find bugs, but not to fix them?
243.
by KingMob 11mo ago
I like FS, but it's always had kind of nebulous morality, though. It lumps in humans with companies, which cannot have morals, under the blanket term "users". This is the same tortured logic as Citizens United and Santa Clara
244.
by KingMob 11mo ago
Yeah, I assume it's missing some context that the numeric solution was off the table.
245.
by KingMob 11mo ago
> Could you point to a snopes page that is demonstrably wrong or misleading? I have the same question for you as the parent comment.
246.
by KingMob 11mo ago
> At least Elon is open about what he believes. @dril: "you do not, under any circumstances, 'gotta hand it to them'"
247.
by KingMob 11mo ago
Fair, but don't forget Altman's sister accused him of sexual abuse in court. ( https://www.newsweek.com/sam-altman-openai-sister-annie-sexu... ) Dunno if it's true. The family wrote it off, saying she's me
248.
by KingMob 11mo ago
But Tesla != Musk. He wasn't actually a founder, he bought his way in, and demanded that everyone agree he was a "founder". Not to mention the huge numbers of real scientists working over the decades to improve battery tech t
249.
by KingMob 11mo ago
OK, but this is true for most younger languages. The older they get, the more they tend to accumulate. Check back in on Zig after another decade.
250.
by KingMob 1y ago
This is a nice argument for why humans should seek to inhabit the moon first, but I'm not sure I would call their proposal "terraforming". There's no wide-scale alteration of atmosphere, temperature, surface, etc.
251.
by KingMob 1y ago
"Keep the national parks funded" sounds like a good use case for lobbying, until you realize it's only needed as a counterweight because lobbying diminishes the relative role of the democratic process itself in meeting needs.
252.
by KingMob 1y ago
American football or international futbol? If American, it's twelfteen furlongs.
253.
by KingMob 1y ago
That particular part is the same, roughly. The bigger issue is just that CC's a better agent than Cursor, last I checked. There's even an official Anthropic VS Code extension to run CC in VS Code. The biggest advantage is being ab
254.
by KingMob 1y ago
I gave up on Jellyfin after media library updates kept hanging on certain video files, and switched to the original Emby it was forked from (iiuc). Emby has a scarily-ancient install process, but it's been working just fine with less h
255.
by KingMob 1y ago
Sorry, but after applying Bayes' Law, I'm down-weighting you as less trustworthy after this comment. Tagged and noted.
256.
by KingMob 1y ago
> You're making the appeal to authority fallacy Funny, I thought he was adjusting his Bayesian priors based on available evidence. From a classical logic perspective, it's correct that authority does not imply truth. But from a
257.
by KingMob 1y ago
Israel already held ~11k Palestinians in indefinite military detention without charges, prior to Oct 7. AKA, hostages. They just released 2k as part of a swap a week ago, but are still holding more hostages than Hamas: https://w
258.
by KingMob 1y ago
I don't see it, and like the other commenters, it seems like the design space is just constrained enough that the projects would have to have some similarities. Regardless, if you think you're being copied, just copy right back. I
259.
by KingMob 1y ago
These are all good points, and if it fits how you think about the problem, git is clearly right for you. I think for me, the unification of concepts, and simplification of DX, wins out. I like being able to use the same set of commands for
260.
by KingMob 1y ago
Mise already supported sops and age ( https://mise.jdx.dev/environments/secrets/ ), so I'm assuming there's something more to it. (Existing or planned.)
261.
by KingMob 1y ago
git and jj are functionally equivalent in this respect, yes, but it's all easier in jj. It all becomes one concept and one command set, instead of three different ones. The git features of stashing/staging are removed, but they&#x
262.
by KingMob 1y ago
To be precise, React was the first (afaik) to apply that to web UI, but definitely not the first to apply that to UI in general. The basic idea of a unidirectional loop is how video games were built for years before React.
263.
by KingMob 1y ago
The parent comment is wrong. Generally, when a new change ID is needed, jj generates a random number. The individual commits under each change still use hashed SHAs. > when I can modify the whole commit You can't actually modify any
264.
by KingMob 1y ago
With the way jj works, all the functions of indexes and stashes are handled with commits. There's no loss of speed, functionality or power, and as a bonus, instead of maintaining 3 separate concepts and commands, they're now handl
265.
by KingMob 1y ago
I'm not sure what you mean by "natively as an edit", but jj really doesn't care if you alter some commit 10 back from the branch tip. Everything is automatically rebased as needed, and unless you introduce conflicts, it&
266.
by KingMob 1y ago
That's even less how jj works, unfortunately for this use case, because jj doesn't require branches to be named. You could probably attach metadata to commits indicating the branch name at time of creation, but there's probab
267.
by KingMob 1y ago
There's a variety of things that all add up to a very pleasant experience. For starters, git has a poorly-designed UI, whereas jj borrows from Mercurial, which was widely-considered to be better designed from a DX perspective. I can us
268.
by KingMob 1y ago
Having used jj for the last year and a half, I hear you on the tooling issues. From IDEs, to plugins, to docs, to workflows, to LLMs, jj is not as well supported as git. Despite that, it's still a net time-saver for me, and I suspect
269.
by KingMob 1y ago
Pretty sure I cracked it: B-E-S-U-R-E-T-O-D-R-I-N-K Y-O-U-R-O-V-A-L-T-I-N-E
270.
by KingMob 1y ago
> the only way to actually cost reduce is too have worse treatment. This is absolutely incorrect in the American system. Insurance companies introduce massive amounts of overhead for little benefit. Every study comparing them to Medicare

More ›