Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Kequc
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
31.
▲
by
Kequc
9y ago
Yeah that'd be the link it's the first image on the page.
32.
▲
by
Kequc
9y ago
Wikipedia lists energy consumption being 70% coal, I'm not sure why the large discrepancy there. I got my information about electrical engines from a website trying to talk up how great it was that we were moving away from oil based en
33.
▲
by
Kequc
9y ago
I don't like that they're touting no emissions. Electricity has to be generated and in the US that's mainly coal. Hybrid vehicles are closer to having it right where running the car charges it and you can get by burning signi
34.
▲
by
Kequc
9y ago
Why is this a bad thing, let people post what they want to. Also if someone says YouTube is censoring them why wouldn't you believe it?
35.
▲
by
Kequc
9y ago
The entire article reads like blog spam. They make a contradictory statement in the same paragraph here: > Experts say such technology is most likely to be used to offer discounts to customers with loyalty status <...> such as to i
36.
▲
by
Kequc
9y ago
The government is going to use them to finally start decrypting all of the VPN traffic they've been storing all these years.
37.
▲
by
Kequc
9y ago
Aren't there other bundlers out there which are much faster, much smaller, and already have had tree shaking for quite a little while? Why are you stating that Webpack is necessary I must be one of the people who doesn't understan
38.
▲
by
Kequc
9y ago
I don't get it either, apparently a tech companies value is tied directly to and only to the size of its user base. I could never use the app effectively so I'm happy to hear it got a redesign of any kind.
39.
▲
by
Kequc
9y ago
This exploit might be defeated with the following css: input[type="password"] { background-image: none !important; } And if the exploit uses `!important` then you just need to make your selector more specific such as putting it in
40.
▲
by
Kequc
9y ago
> No one would implement this in a real productive project. Oh my word. If it's code on the internet someone will use it. Especially functional programmers who have somehow landed themselves in a JavaScript position. I've seen
41.
▲
by
Kequc
9y ago
I don't think iOS has ever been a half decent operating system, but that's an example of how a lot of the discussion in this thread might be subjective. A glimpse into what's going on in my opinion can be seen in the long awa
42.
▲
by
Kequc
9y ago
One of the primary reasons I don't like posting here or on services like you describe is because I cannot delete anything. Maybe you've enough users who don't care about that but it should be taken into consideration that man
43.
▲
by
Kequc
9y ago
Haha I'm not gonna spend $60/month on data for my phone. You can buy a new phone three times a year for that. But you've got a point, a lot of people do.
44.
▲
by
Kequc
9y ago
I don't want webpages being preloaded on mobile because as it stands mobile carriers are still charging an arm and a leg for mobile data. Preloading means that pages are being loaded that I never see. The clientside ecosystem is mad, a
45.
▲
by
Kequc
9y ago
I'm reasonably secure in my feeling that centralisation isn't the problem. As much as people far too freely giving up information about themselves online. Decentralisation can work as an anti-censorship measure but I wouldn'
46.
▲
by
Kequc
9y ago
Forgive me if I've missed it but I haven't seen any evidence that quantum computing has been used to solve even a very simple calculation. It seems that the purpose behind trying to build a quantum computer; is you really need to
47.
▲
by
Kequc
9y ago
I cannot count how many interviews I've done where I've shown up with 10+ years of industry experience and been given an interview catered toward juniors. If anything there is too much emphasis on interviewing entry level software
48.
▲
by
Kequc
9y ago
The Open Internet Preservation Act (Dec 2017) https://freedomoutpost.com/open-internet-preservation-act-se... http://techfreedom.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NN_02_xml....
49.
▲
by
Kequc
9y ago
Why don't Democrats pass NN through congress and get it enshrined into law? Instead of trying to block that from happening, since it's Republicans who are trying to do that. Why was NN so easy to repeal in the first place? Why did
50.
▲
by
Kequc
9y ago
I don't use Atom but I would say, if I did, that my development environment includes hardware that has 800MB available. This isn't to suggest I'm ok with bloat, I absolutely am not. But if the most important thing on my compu
51.
▲
by
Kequc
9y ago
Why would anyone suspect that? You're talking about what 1 in several million users? All you have to be is above the threshold of "easy to hack". I'd like to be referred to such a thing if there is one already.
52.
▲
by
Kequc
9y ago
This seems to me like a very clean solution, is there a Chrome extension version of something like this? I'd love to tap on a password field, enter my secret key, and have it autofill based on the domain of the page.
53.
▲
by
Kequc
9y ago
That's approximately 100 lava lamps each at 100W = 10,000W = 10kW/h * 20.4 cents = $2.04/h * 24 = $48.96/day $1,489.20/month. Ignoring the fact that is very little money in Silicon Valley. Lava lamps consume a large
54.
▲
by
Kequc
9y ago
I may not be up on the latest news. My understanding from the best sources I can find detail a disagreement within the government about how net neutrality is implemented, not that it exists. Internet providers want to repeal net neutrality.
55.
▲
by
Kequc
9y ago
I was allowed to walk to and from school by myself every day. Not only that I spent a great deal of time not under my parent's gaze. In fact most people are raised outside of this situation you are imagining. You are calling basically
56.
▲
by
Kequc
9y ago
This feels like the logos are better than there and logojoy took me through far too many steps. Leaving the forced registration to right before you even get to see the logos they generated. OP is a lot better.
57.
▲
by
Kequc
9y ago
Other people could make competitors, and more importantly, people who are using Facebook could switch. It happened to MySpace. Makes a lot more sense to me than turning it into a public utility or breaking it up anyway. Just stop using it,
58.
▲
by
Kequc
9y ago
I touched on this before in my rambling. Google botched it, not the product itself as the initial offering of G+ was actually really really good. Far better than Facebook, a return to basics in a clean interface with Circles. Groups being a
59.
▲
by
Kequc
9y ago
This has been going on for a while but all the way down to the web host it seems like companies are on board with this stuff. I've found that terms of service for web hosting companies generally includes a clause that specifies one of
60.
▲
by
Kequc
9y ago
Don't wanna point any fingers but that sounded a little bit extremist to me.
More ›