K0nserv

60 ms·

661.
by K0nserv 10y ago
Really cool, it'd be nice to have a few more screenshots or maybe a video of the usage. It's not fully clear if Felony actually sends the message or only encrypts it and allows you to send the encrypted message in another medium.
662.
by K0nserv 10y ago
The people who would vet the code before execution are experienced enough to change it from curl | bash to curl > install.sh and then read it before executing. The only thing you can, and should, criticise here is the delivery over HTTP
663.
by K0nserv 10y ago
It's not wrong. It just doesn't align with Facebook's business needs
664.
by K0nserv 10y ago
That's my opinion and that's why I have my 2FA tokens in a different app. Still on the same device which might not be the best.
665.
by K0nserv 10y ago
I use the excellent 1Password, syncing over WiFi with my phone as the source of truth for my vault. 2FA enabled for everything that supports it and backup codes stored physically. Works great and password managers are one of the few times w
666.
by K0nserv 10y ago
I was only correcting the parent regarding the BBC. I don't have enough knowledge about the industry to comment on the surrounding costs, but I imagine that there's a lot of content where it would be worth it.
667.
by K0nserv 10y ago
Doesn't say the content should be free, it says it should be available. Classic case of "please take my money".
668.
by K0nserv 10y ago
I've started using a bundled app for messenger.com so haven't looked into blocking them for that. Also use the mobile Messenger app a fair bit. I'd like to switch away from the Facebook platform, but it's seriously diffi
669.
by K0nserv 10y ago
I used to have a rule in my ad blocker that blocked the typing notification and read notification from being sent. Both of which are features that I despise When typing a `POST https://www.facebook.com/ajax/messaging&#x
670.
by K0nserv 10y ago
Unit tests can also prevent aggressive refactoring by being heavily coupled to the implementation due to the nature of mocking essentially private details of the code under tests. You then have to aggressively refactor your tests along with
671.
by K0nserv 10y ago
Turns out there are ad networks that support HTTPS, who'd have thunk it?
672.
by K0nserv 10y ago
I've been using Freedome[0] for a few months now and I am really liking it. While I don't use it to escape censorship and digital embargos it's adequate for such purposes too. You can pick from exit IPs all over the world and
673.
by K0nserv 11y ago
The author even addresses the fact that they didn't set the background on the site. "I would've even made this site's background a nice #EEEEEE if I wasn't so focused on keeping declarations to a lean 7 fucking line
674.
by K0nserv 11y ago
Fun story about NoScript. I used to use AMP[0]. But I reverted that for two reasons. 1. The size of their js is ~170kb roughly 17 times larger than most of my pages. 2. It loads from a 3d party domain which means that NoScript/uBlock O
675.
by K0nserv 11y ago
Thanks, glad you liked it :) If you do give it a try and run into problems tweet me at @k0nserv.
676.
by K0nserv 11y ago
Quite happy with my own web page/blog. Pages hover at around 10kb, 30kb if I include some images. I think the page size can be attributed a lot to there being no JS except for GA. I have taken a lot of inspiration from http:/&#x2
677.
by K0nserv 11y ago
git checkout <file> to discard. This will checkout the full file to latest version tracked. Alternatively If you wanna save some of the file you can use git add -p <file> and stage the individual parts you want. After you'
678.
by K0nserv 11y ago
Great set of tips. Unfortunately I find that so many post that suggest rebase recommend against force pushing. This takes a lot of the power away from rebase/amend. So much does this happen that is wrote a blog post titled "You sh
679.
by K0nserv 11y ago
You are right, that's an oversight of mine. Didn't keep the 48 hour thing in mind when writing that comment. My bad
680.
by K0nserv 11y ago
I'm inclined to agree that it's an improvement over the status quo for people that didn't use passcodes from before. I do trust Apple more than many other entities and as you say they don't have a database with fingerpri
681.
by K0nserv 11y ago
That's a good point. For people who never had a passcode it's big step up in security. It definitely depends on what the threat model is. If you are protecting yourself from coworkers it might be enough(depending on who your cowor
682.
by K0nserv 11y ago
It's not really about hacking Touch ID. Apple has published a really thorough whitepaper[0] on the security of Touch ID and the secure enclave. I don't really think that hacking the Secure Enclave to extract fingerprints is even p
683.
by K0nserv 11y ago
The whole notion of using fingerprints for authentication is weird. Essentially something that's akin to a username is being used as a password. I've wrote about this practice the other day[0]. It's interesting to observe tha
684.
by K0nserv 11y ago
https://community.letsencrypt.org/t/rate-limits-for-lets-enc... Also linked lower down in the thread
685.
by K0nserv 11y ago
Luckily they are raising the rate limit now when they are out of beta.
686.
by K0nserv 11y ago
Let's Encrypt might be one of the most important initiatives for a secure web. I applaud all their great work. The fact that they have chosen to reduce certificate lifetime in order to encourage automation is a really big win for the s
687.
by K0nserv 11y ago
My $0.02 Publishers should look to Stack Overflow and be inspired to run ads of high quality and relevance[0]. Throw out the ad networks, tracking, and reject rich media ads. Instead focus on high value ads that align well with your readers
688.
by K0nserv 11y ago
https://twitter.com/K0nserv/status/689169965526700032
689.
by K0nserv 11y ago
This is interesting for signature based AVs. More interestingly bypassing dynamic AV engines that execute code in a sandbox seems to be fairly trivial as well. For example allocating 100mb or memory, running a few million iterations in a lo
690.
by K0nserv 11y ago
Git commit and push takes a minute or two tops I fail to see how that is less efficient than clicking save in a WYIWYG editor. The setup time between the two options is probably very similar.

More ›