Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
JyB
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
31.
▲
by
JyB
1y ago
No one think any form of "prompt engineering" "guardrails" are serious security measures right?
32.
▲
by
JyB
1y ago
Assuming you're using GitHub or similar, make pushing branches and creating PRs part of their prompts, and review on the GitHub app or equivalent? Seem like an orthogonal problem to those LLMs tools.
33.
▲
by
JyB
1y ago
> I can start a Claude Code session and if I need to leave my laptop, I can respond from my phone anywhere I've been looking for this for some time now. This is amazing if it delivers.
34.
▲
by
JyB
1y ago
That's a funny response I have to admit. No 100% serious, I don't see the advantage.
35.
▲
by
JyB
1y ago
That's exactly how you should do it. You can also plug in an MCP for your CI or mention cli.github.com in your prompt to also make it iterate on CI failures. Next you use claude code instead and you make several work on their own clone
36.
▲
by
JyB
1y ago
I’m really wondering what internally causes this. No one likes it when they have outages, but it keeps happening. Is this a culture thing? Like pressure to ship features fast? Some under staffed teams or lack of ownership on some crucial c
37.
▲
by
JyB
1y ago
Because iterating multiple sessions through multiple terminals is obviously more efficient and seamless than interacting thought a scuffed IDE side panel ui.
38.
▲
by
JyB
1y ago
Better prompts?
39.
▲
by
JyB
1y ago
Same question. I don’t understand what they mean by that. It obviously seem pretty central to how Claude Code is so effective.
40.
▲
by
JyB
1y ago
How can it not be exactly what’s happening?
41.
▲
by
JyB
1y ago
I thought Claude code was pay as you go!?
42.
▲
by
JyB
1y ago
There is something much deeper going on when you force yourself to actually write things down. This is especially relevant in engineering. That is why "RFCs" are so prevalent in many tech companies. They are often just as useful t
43.
▲
by
JyB
1y ago
There is the Claude Code cli, now Gemini CLI. Where is ChatGPT CLI?
44.
▲
by
JyB
1y ago
> "LLMs are one of the technologies that exist, like autocorrection and CAD" Pretending it's on par with these. No need for more. Seem inevitable enough.
45.
▲
by
JyB
1y ago
Incredible that so many people still don't understand what an LLM is. Especially ones that you would expect to grasp it.
46.
▲
by
JyB
1y ago
Yes apparently which makes this report pretty flimsy.
47.
▲
by
JyB
1y ago
Therefore what are the odds that this is just the LLM doing its thing versus "a vulnerability". Seem like a pretty obvious bet.
48.
▲
by
JyB
1y ago
I don’t see anything here that would prevent a LLM from generating these. Right?
49.
▲
by
JyB
1y ago
I believe it is extremely important to disclose that the ‘responses leaks’ you obtained did not originate from LLM models themselves, but rather through other insecure systems / in a more conventional manner. Just to avoid yet another
50.
▲
by
JyB
1y ago
It doesn’t have to be as performant nor fast. It can work and iterate alone when setup properly. All time spent is purely bonus. It is already inevitable.
51.
▲
by
JyB
1y ago
Fair. I'm using Claude Code which is pay as you go. The Market will probably do its things. (The company pays anyway obviously)
52.
▲
by
JyB
1y ago
Ive never used that many. The LLM performances collapse/degrade significantly because of too much initial context? It seems like MCP implems updates could easily solve that. Like only injecting relevant servers for the given task bas
53.
▲
by
JyB
1y ago
That autocompounding aspect of constantly refining initial prompts with more and more knowledge is so interesting. Gut feeling says it’s something that will be “standardized” in some way, exactly like what MCP did.
54.
▲
by
JyB
1y ago
I guess I don't see the technical limitation. Seem like a protocol update issue.
55.
▲
by
JyB
1y ago
Do you mean that some tools (MCP clients) pass all functions of all configured MCP servers in the initial prompt? If that's the case: I understand the knee-jerk reaction but if it works? Also what theoretically prevents altering th
56.
▲
by
JyB
1y ago
> It demands too much context. This is solved trivially by having default initial prompts. All majors tools like Claude Code or Gemini CLI have ways to set them up. > You pass all your tools to an LLM and ask it to filter it down bas
57.
▲
by
JyB
1y ago
It’s the whole “MCP” moto right? Basically keep re-feeding in each subsequent prompts the additional requested context?
58.
▲
by
JyB
1y ago
Or US/Norwegian forces covered by NATO exercises.
59.
▲
by
JyB
1y ago
The whole point of Datadog is that you can seamlessly go between products for the same event source. Doesn’t it just highlight a setup issue?
60.
▲
by
JyB
1y ago
This is such a great move. Faith restored in the language after the generics debacle.
More ›