Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Jupe
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
91.
▲
by
Jupe
3y ago
Well, that's one individual who has looked past the techno shiny object that is ChatGPT/AI. Unfortunately, if the idea behind Moloch [1] has any credibility (which I think the collection action problem does) someone else will _by
92.
▲
by
Jupe
3y ago
Yeah, assuming autofacs (or similar) are actually created. :/
93.
▲
by
Jupe
3y ago
Just coordinating the 1:1 mapping I might want is fraught with challenges. Network delays, out-of-order execution, stampeding herd situations, poison objects, processors crashing (or being rebooted) at random times... I'm not seeing th
94.
▲
by
Jupe
3y ago
That does not sound very secure. Also, what's to stop another processor "finding" the Object before the intended recipient?
95.
▲
by
Jupe
3y ago
I'm scared of AI, but not because of nuclear weapon deployments... Long before we get to AI actually launching a nuclear weapon, we'll need to survive the social, economic and political fallout such technology brings. What happens
96.
▲
by
Jupe
3y ago
New or Used car dealerships? Foreign, Domestic or either? Sales or Service? Just cold emails probably won't get much traction. Just a few simple ideas: * Call the contacts rather than email. * Does it/should it integrate with deal
97.
▲
by
Jupe
3y ago
While I completely agree that the efforts to build and maintain a set of micro-services are often better leveraged by a single monolith (even one that has several "run modes" as you've done here), a few questions inevitably c
98.
▲
by
Jupe
3y ago
Huh. Not a mention of the impact of tax filing changes around R&D. Software development salaries can no longer be treated as expenses and are now treated (somewhat correctly) as depreciable expenses. Not sure this is a root cause, but i
99.
▲
by
Jupe
3y ago
In a way, Community may be the past of AI... Meaning the "Great Pause" [1] could happen, not by decree/law/agreement, but by people who will (out of self-preservation?) stop adding quality content to the free data source
100.
▲
Slaughterbots [video]
(youtube.com)
3 points
by
Jupe
3y ago
|
1 comments
101.
▲
Crowd-based forecasting site Metaculus
(metaculus.com)
2 points
by
Jupe
3y ago
|
0 comments
102.
▲
by
Jupe
4y ago
Interesting points in the article, but it seems to assume current state of the art will continue as-is, and frankly, shows little to no imagination of what "might be". It reads like the personal computer "ok, so what?" r
103.
▲
by
Jupe
4y ago
And, by the time you "know it all", the playing field has changed. RESTful APIs? Nope, we are going full-gRPC. No hand-rolled OAuth - we are using AuthSolution1. Forget that, AuthSolution1 has a security vulnerability, we are goin
104.
▲
by
Jupe
4y ago
Ok, a couple of derivative "fears" around this... 1> Relying on code reviews has concerns, IMO. For example, how many engineers actually review the code in their dependencies? (But, I guess it wouldn't take that much to
105.
▲
by
Jupe
4y ago
This is awesome, scary and very interesting. But, for me, it comes with a personal concern: For some time I've been giving serious thought about an automated web service generator. Given a data model and information about the data (rel
106.
▲
by
Jupe
4y ago
Maybe Levee is wading into the AI-assisted talent search space (ala Draup, Fetcher, hireview) and the algorithm spotted something "iffy"? (Not saying there is anything truly "iffy", but who knows).
107.
▲
by
Jupe
4y ago
Wait, are you saying Amazon doesn't know who to pay for the items I order?
108.
▲
by
Jupe
4y ago
> If you need to formally specify behavior, at any point in the pipeline, then we're back to square one: you just invented a programming language, and a very bad one at that. But what if the "programming language" is not a
109.
▲
by
Jupe
4y ago
Fair enough - assuming steady state, but the acceleration is the curve I'm most curious about. The point I was alluding to above was that the prompts themselves will be recursively mined over time. Eventually, except for truly novel pr
110.
▲
by
Jupe
4y ago
Isn't the "Chat" part of ChatGPT already doing something close to this? I mean the clarification comes from the end-user, not from the AI, but with enough of this stuff to feed upon, perhaps AIs could "get there" at
111.
▲
by
Jupe
4y ago
Isn't there a "throat to choke" aspect of this as well? While not actual indemnification, leveraging a cloud vendor at least allows for a "but AWS/Google/Azure" was down response to your customers. And cos
112.
▲
The CADT Model
(jwz.org)
1 points
by
Jupe
4y ago
|
0 comments
113.
▲
by
Jupe
4y ago
Worth a read if only for the CADT reference ( https://www.jwz.org/doc/cadt.html ) But, so much more as well!
114.
▲
by
Jupe
4y ago
This is probably the most important response / question in this discussion. Assuming for a moment that AI-generated content will be ubiquitous enough to impact the sources of a new generation of AI tooling, what is the mathematical lim
115.
▲
by
Jupe
4y ago
IMO... If the query is for OLAP the data may need to be extracted to another data store. If the query is for OLTP, then the design is wrong. I don't know your problem space, but pulling data from 128 shards to resolve queries while a u
116.
▲
by
Jupe
4y ago
Unless the company goes out of business, or as may happen more often today, just dissolve the company and re-brand/re-incorporate.
117.
▲
by
Jupe
4y ago
Sorry to hear that. We had a few cordless vacs - each one has died due to the battery. No replacements available :/ Even the very expensive Dyson. So far, my Dewalt cordless vac (which has a replaceable battery, by design, since it
118.
▲
by
Jupe
4y ago
LED's will last 25,000 hours. The drivers (the components that convert AC to the required DC, at a constant/steady rate) however, apparently die long before the actual LED does. I've replaced many so far. It's not hard i
119.
▲
by
Jupe
4y ago
Any alternatives? We are "lucky" to have a Target, Walmart, Meijer, Nieman Marcus, Khols and Macy's nearby. (Sears and Hudsons have gone). But, from my experience, on many product lines, they sell the same "crap".
120.
▲
by
Jupe
4y ago
Firstly, I'd suggest the author look at this differently; perhaps "For Want of a Code Review". Especially code from a relatively recent graduate, on a piece of code for which the engineer in question has little experience. Wi
More ›