Jumziey

8 ms·

1.
by Jumziey 3mo ago
It's actually fun to see this. Running systems in a lot of different ways are just interesting. I do however get kinda sad at the hate at k8s because it's really good at what it does. I've seen so many projects bending over
2.
by Jumziey 2y ago
https://screego.net/#/ Just want to give it a shout out in this context, same tech and quite mature. Been using it successfully at work for remote pair programming and it feels like your looking at your co workers scre
3.
by Jumziey 3y ago
SystemD bashing aside :p Talos is pretty awesome for setting up clusters. At home I just run talos with matchbox for PXE bootstrapping it works like a charm. Been really easy to maintain too. I normally just update matchbox and then reset a
4.
by Jumziey 3y ago
Lots of comments about issues with dependencies and Graal. I suggest looking into Quarkus. Have had great success with and mandrel (a patched version of Graal for Quarkus). Quarkus focuses on creating Web APIs so wont cover it all but if th
5.
by Jumziey 3y ago
I think the issue is that any energi i spent on trying to make my apps have a less of a co2 footprint would be better spent engaging in climate questions instead, preferbly using ones profession. Ie doing stuff like writing applications tha
6.
by Jumziey 4y ago
This is a great paper, did my master thesis on adapting in to autonomously navigating large bodies of water with a boat/ship or similar. For which it worked great! It's almost weird it haven't gotten more attention yet! Aweso
7.
by Jumziey 5y ago
So you think the issue is semantics and not understanding? Being due today and having 5 developers thinking the end goal is different and working against each other is way worse then spending some time building consensus and work toward the
8.
by Jumziey 5y ago
You can certainly misrepresent your own article. But in this case you're arguing different things as far as I interpret your text.
9.
by Jumziey 5y ago
You having a successful career is not really relevant to the discussion. I do agree though that the most important part of a professional life is to fill the gap within your team. But that's another discussion.
10.
by Jumziey 5y ago
I supposed instead of saying DevOps has lost its meaning it has been co-opted from it's original meaning to something else. Problem is just that it isn't well defined. I like a definition like this, but as an earlier comment talke
11.
by Jumziey 5y ago
I'm all ears when you're on brake.
12.
by Jumziey 5y ago
You can certainly advertise a DevOps culture in a listing that isn't for a DevOps engineer, it's not mutually exclusive. What's DevOps skills in your opinion?
13.
by Jumziey 5y ago
I think there's a point to the blog article itself, but i think you miss a vital point in the conclusion. The way a DevOps position that is described in the blog post is a valid position that could have DevOps in the title. But that&#x
14.
by Jumziey 5y ago
In many way the adoption of DevOps has many similarities with the larger adoption of agile development. It just looses it original meaning in a world of little reflection and just surface level knowledge. Those who can manage to surpass tha
15.
by Jumziey 5y ago
Generally in my experience, a company that's looking for a DevOps engineer does not know what DevOps is. DevOps is great, but it's not a title. It's beautifully summarized in "The DevOps Handbook" and it's fict
16.
by Jumziey 6y ago
Yeah, but why? Is it a feeling? Is it because it's not relevant if you can't immediately read the code since it's not a language you usually read/write in? Once again just curious :)
17.
by Jumziey 6y ago
I agree, "machine learning framework written in <lang>" is relevant, not sure i agree about an interpreter though :p
18.
by Jumziey 6y ago
First off: Interesting thoughts! I couldn't agree more about the importance to make things easy to build. I'm not sure i agree about C++ and C applications being particularly easy to build though. Personally i have not seen any pa
19.
by Jumziey 6y ago
Might be a little off topic, but what’s with the ”written in” obsession? From my perspective it’s so irrelevant compared to well tested, design, architectured, community engagement, track record, performance and usability. Call me crazy, bu
20.
by Jumziey 6y ago
Brilliant. It's a really good compliment to strangling certain parts of a large code base. As always the key is getting the information to the right people at the right time, and making it more difficult to make the wrong choices then
21.
by Jumziey 6y ago
It's impressive how fast they are at fixing outages, barely a coffee break required. I'm almost starting to believe in this DevOps thing...
22.
by Jumziey 6y ago
Exciting!
23.
by Jumziey 6y ago
Oh no, this article is on hacker news so you wont get incrementaly higher spikes in the forseeble future...
24.
by Jumziey 6y ago
This article is so odd in its conclusion. The problem lies in obscurity generating a mess thats hard to reason around by designers, hiding obvious weakpoints, making it hard to find the most valuable area to work on. Changing from a default
25.
by Jumziey 6y ago
Slightly opinionated, but very funny and scary at the same time. I guess you could say I’m emotionally confused
26.
by Jumziey 6y ago
Isn't the idea with unit testing forgotten here? The point is to validate the blocks you build and use to build the program. In order to make sure you've done each block right you test them, manually or automated... Automated test
27.
by Jumziey 8y ago
Ah, crap!
28.
by Jumziey 8y ago
Apparently not safe for work
29.
by Jumziey 8y ago
Whaaat!? I who always thought irc was the on-prem Slack alternative. Its a pretty cool thing that recently got created (around 1988). Try it out! Will blow you mind straight out of the water tbh. There's even some public chat rooms you
30.
by Jumziey 9y ago
94... Of course you'll find something interesting (I literally only read the first two sentences)

More ›