JuliusBranson

4 ms·

1.
by JuliusBranson 5y ago
I'm only interested in why you believe what you believe. How smart are you? What do you value most? How truth-oriented is your epistemology? I'm glad you don't discriminate (nothing "reverse" about it) against men,
2.
by JuliusBranson 5y ago
People seem to take it as some sort of impressive critique of statistics and the scientific method. Similar to "there is a Replication Crisis, vaguely speaking, so your bigot facts don't matter." No, the replication crisis is
3.
by JuliusBranson 5y ago
I'm not sure why this sort of thing impresses people, it's obvious the 1984 ghostbuster group skews old.
4.
by JuliusBranson 5y ago
I think "useful" is doing a lot of work here. A lot of math notation exists clearly to gate keep. It's often nonsensical. It's a shame because it really makes mathematicians look bad (re:annoying) to those who can see th
5.
by JuliusBranson 5y ago
Correct. Inflation is when the dollar gets weaker for the masses because the elite are printing themselves dollars. Deflation is when the dollar gets stronger for the masses because the elite's proportion of the national currency is de
6.
by JuliusBranson 5y ago
>Printing fiat makes stablecoins denominated in the currency lose real value, not gain in it. What's the case for this statement? In general, I don't expect to commodities to change value just because some currency was redistri
7.
by JuliusBranson 5y ago
>Leaving aside the dubious idea that the Federal Reserve can give their friends the ability to print money You didn't read my comment correctly.
8.
by JuliusBranson 5y ago
Stablecoins are dangerous because they have the potential to change the current selection effects on the elite. For one thing, stablecoins subvert the ability of the Federal Reserve to print money and give it to their friends at Goldman Sac