Juliate

57 ms·

751.
by Juliate 5y ago
A paradox may also only be that you're not looking at the "thing" from the correct perspective to understand its true nature and why it looks like a paradox from an other, partial perspective. Eg. allegory of the cave, or mor
752.
by Juliate 5y ago
Yes, not screwing up the biome on which we all depend to live (and countless other species) is definitely a political motive. Is there a problem with that? Don't think so.
753.
by Juliate 5y ago
> Oil companies don't have any special ability to predict the future state of a complex system. No, but they definitely have the scientific knowledge to understand the scale at which they pump CO2 into the atmosphere and the first-o
754.
by Juliate 5y ago
> I doubt the movie expressed absolute certainty, but it was indisputably meant to be alarming. Well, seasoned reasonable discourse from the scientific community started in the 70s (as well as knowledge of the issue among oil companies).
755.
by Juliate 5y ago
> The only difference between humans and everything else, we as a species collectively said, "no" to nature ruling our lives. Indeed, it's not kind to anything. However, even by saying "no" to nature, we're
756.
by Juliate 5y ago
Nonsense. Nature is not "an enemy", it's where you're coming from and what you're made of and what you're living in. It's something to deal with, for sure. However treating nature as "the enemy"
757.
by Juliate 5y ago
So, it's more about adaptation than "kindness".
758.
by Juliate 5y ago
Nature isn't kind to humans if you separate the two and if you think one ought something towards the other. But humans are a small element of nature. They originated from this environment, live within it, return to it.
759.
by Juliate 5y ago
> If size = intelligence, I'd expect to … Your understanding of “intelligence” is quite anthropo-centered, of the XXth century-office-work style… Nothing ever _requires_ that intelligence has to express itself in a consistent/c
760.
by Juliate 5y ago
> My current hypothesis is that the team is all that matters. That's me 6 years ago. After having invested too much on the type of work/mission and found that this was not it. From the past 6 years and 2 companies where I tried
761.
by Juliate 5y ago
And, you also get complete clowns that accumulate visibility and social-media-status-points thanks to the understanding of the manipulation tools offered to them but are actually incompetent to the verge of dangerous and in the worst case c
762.
by Juliate 5y ago
I see many more "old money/high status" families that keep it quiet, finding stable/calm positions to keep on doing what they do, rather than seeking the riskiest famous lifestyles. High status != high maintenance neithe
763.
by Juliate 5y ago
Would people use your product (or a version of your product) for free? And then, could you package some feature to sell as a premium on top of the free version that would make people convert? Either way, do you track your conversion channel
764.
by Juliate 5y ago
Well, at least, at last, that's a rather nuanced view of what 10x means... not the mumbo-jumbo bullshit discourse that's trending on LinkedIn.
765.
by Juliate 5y ago
As for anything that old, there's a huge lot of context (cultural, religious, geographic, contemporary, societal) that informs what was written and all the understandings around it (be it religious or cultural). You're totally in
766.
by Juliate 5y ago
There are equivalents ( https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Responsabilit%C3%A9_limit%C3%A... - in French) but country-specific, there's no a European common structure. But another benefit from LLCs in the USA might be t
767.
by Juliate 6y ago
Related read: http://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/2020/06/09/what-journalists-s... (from other thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26867366 ) As always, it's quite more a complex fact
768.
by Juliate 6y ago
It's not that socializing norms revolve around alcohol. It is that alcohol is one popular, amongst others, medium for socializing (because it's enjoyable, because it relaxes, etc. not for everyone, but for enough people). But, as
769.
by Juliate 6y ago
Why would AI solve this problem in the first place? We barely understand how biased it is, and even if/why it's necessarily biased, not by design, but by nature. As in, biased, because the reference you use is subjective to the ti
770.
by Juliate 6y ago
Same dilemna here. But, like books, that's the only way my kids and their kids may keep the actual artefact of something that I did read or listen to (be it a book, or a vinyl). So, if I appreaciate/care about what it is/says
771.
by Juliate 6y ago
From a purely financial point of view, if that's all that matter, yes, you may compare streaming/vinyl/CDs. ... those are _different_ markets: - Streaming is about subscription to a right to listen to music passing by, attach
772.
by Juliate 6y ago
Why the downvotes?... At this level, this is directly the consequences of either a choice (that Apple services would behave like this), either a lack of design/thinking through the whole user path. Whichever it is, it does not sound ve
773.
by Juliate 6y ago
Ah... design in all its glory. With consequences way down the line.
774.
by Juliate 6y ago
It's as much "the next big thing" as "Cloud" has been since 2006 or so: as basic a valid option to organize for substantial scale operations as for the past 15 years. "SRE" may be a Google-initiated label,
775.
by Juliate 6y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocide#International_law quotes: Article II of the Convention defines genocide as: ... any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a natio
776.
by Juliate 6y ago
Yes organizations are vastly more complicated, in a way they're some kind of chaos, like a garden. A garden, being big or small, is still chaos: not that there's no order, but that there's different species (animal, vegetal,
777.
by Juliate 6y ago
We're saying exactly the same thing, but well...
778.
by Juliate 6y ago
> In contrast, in cyberspace, the chance of holding attackers accountable is much lower. Yes, because this is still a new and partially unregulated space. But deterrence is growing slowly but surely, for both individuals and states.
779.
by Juliate 6y ago
No. That was not thoughtful of you given the threat model. But the fault is always, _always_ on the one who commits the crime. Claiming the contrary is exactly victim blaming.
780.
by Juliate 6y ago
This feels wrong, but disarmement works when all parties willfully participate in it. All you need is one foul player for this path to fail. Before WWII, Germany was forbidden from remaking an army. It still did. Where Europe & US could

More ›