Juliate

30 ms·

421.
by Juliate 2y ago
> They are openly caught in lies continuously Example? Source? > and people like you deciding not to hold them accountable I'm sorry, what? :D
422.
by Juliate 2y ago
I quote you: "most major news media these days". These days, or decades? As for the quoted X/Twitter account, it's plain obvious as day it's not playing in the trustworthy source of information camp. Calling "m
423.
by Juliate 2y ago
Timely read: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42192412
424.
by Juliate 2y ago
And so is the hope to make baby-boomers, if only, understand this. What are the good, optimistic, realistic, decent perspectives left for the years to come?
425.
by Juliate 2y ago
Source please?
426.
by Juliate 2y ago
From experience, two companies can state using Scrum, while: 1/ having entirely different practices, 2/ that are not Scrum, 3/ being unable to come to a specific definition of Scrum that matches the initial one, 3/ not b
427.
by Juliate 2y ago
> People on the left control 90% of the media. 1/ Documentation to support that claim, please. 2/ Especially since "left" and "right" barely mean anything now that far-right, no, even human-denyingly-insane-
428.
by Juliate 2y ago
Pointing out the wrong path does not require providing a good one: it's better to stay put rather than engaging in a bad path. I totally agree with you about the cesspool that X/Twitter has become. I believe it _is_ indeed subject
429.
by Juliate 2y ago
Your rant is like blaming drug addicts for the existence of cartels: ineffective.
430.
by Juliate 2y ago
> the only meaningful measurement is business value That's true for the business. But the business is not always the unique and only incentive in work, generally speaking. > Those decisions are usually decided from higher up than
431.
by Juliate 2y ago
The hint that productivity is perceived (subjective, qualitative), but not measured (quantitative), is good. Productivity is argued, in the end, not demonstrated; or only within a very specific, limited framework (a very productive endeavou
432.
by Juliate 2y ago
An exec that does not understand core tenets (and challenges) of the industry his company operates on is an exec that will drive said company out of relevance. Whatever the size of the company. Boeing is one but a glaring recent example of
433.
by Juliate 2y ago
Compassion or empathy requires relatedness and co-experience. That is, it requires a self. If it has a self, it's not a machine anymore.
434.
by Juliate 2y ago
Have a colleague doing this. His rationale is that the phone is for synchronous communication only. All the rest lives in the tablet and is both more practical and more cumbersome enough that it is used as a tool and not addictive/wast
435.
by Juliate 2y ago
Impressive but meh. Impressive on the relative quality of the output. And of the productivity gains, sure. But meh on the substance of it. It may be a dream for (financial) producers. For the direct customers as well (advertisement obviousl
436.
by Juliate 2y ago
"Best" art in history is a relic of past powerful people's taste and ambitions. And of the preservation of it (still today, there are fools that willingly destroy/erase remnants of art or culture). The difference is that
437.
by Juliate 2y ago
The difference, in the analogy, is that a washing machine is a solution to a specific problem, that has evolved through time and infrastructure development. AI (and computer technology) is more like electricity in this case. A raw technolog
438.
by Juliate 2y ago
Sometimes what is needed is not to solve or explain, but to acknowledge a problem. To name it. And to have the restraint and patience and trust that its understanding, alone, will take care of most of it.
439.
by Juliate 2y ago
I guess the parent meant that it was comparatively way cheaper and easier to send probes, rather than people. And that we did send probes, even way further than the Moon.
440.
by Juliate 2y ago
You mean he was more respectable when he didn't talk so much his mind?
441.
by Juliate 2y ago
Yes. A higher risk of SQL injection too, also. Or of brute force attacks/scans, but those are often not managed at the app/framework level anyway.
442.
by Juliate 2y ago
That depends a lot on how complex, large and critical your app is. And on the skills of the builder and the maintainer. The surface attack is considerably reduced if you do not rely on a large list of dependencies. Moreover, you do manage t
443.
by Juliate 2y ago
What's the use case? Music playing depending on the position?
444.
by Juliate 2y ago
> there's something [...] about being protective of your "culture and values" in this way and to this extent Yes, AND it may also be because it's kind of innovation in the open, before it's really ready or that a
445.
by Juliate 2y ago
Resting ears. Ear training. Doing your scales. Training your taste. (re)learning old/new tech/tools/instrument/history/theory of music. (re)listening to known/new music from separate styles/periods/cu
446.
by Juliate 2y ago
The nature of the work is not the same, hence, the proportion of the modalities of your work are not identical. The problem is considering that only your office boss work view is the one that qualifies as work. The problem is also consideri
447.
by Juliate 2y ago
> and aren't generally allotted time in the schedule for self-improvement. I never met a company that didn't expect to have this in the schedule and budget for their employees. Given the breadth of technologies and the pace of
448.
by Juliate 2y ago
Yes, but that's still a peculiar separation. Learning, training, practicing, teaching, rehearsing, performing are just several different modalities of (the) work, with distinct proportions depending on the job and the role(s). It'
449.
by Juliate 2y ago
Practice and training are work.
450.
by Juliate 2y ago
Does it matter?

More ›