Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
JoshCole
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
31 ms
·
181.
▲
by
JoshCole
4y ago
That is such a cool site; thank you for sharing it.
182.
▲
by
JoshCole
4y ago
Your source is a liar. Some examples: - After lying about SpaceX launch costs, he later posts screenshots of articles. One of those articles had the true launch costs. The image was photoshopped to remove this launch cost. - When posting pr
183.
▲
by
JoshCole
4y ago
Very bad source. I go into why in more detail in this comment, but to keep it short: his numbers are lies and he knows it too - some of his screenshots are photoshopped to preserve his narrative. He has an agenda - an anti-Elon Musk agenda
184.
▲
by
JoshCole
4y ago
It can help to understand why some people think inaction is an action by abstracting the problem such that you can model it in a computer using standard decision problem algorithms. When you do that you have an initial state and you have tw
185.
▲
by
JoshCole
4y ago
I don't see how I made your point. There is a big difference between freedom to express and freedom from compulsion. He hasn't claimed that others don't have freedom to express - he has claimed that their expectations of him
186.
▲
by
JoshCole
4y ago
The UN Declaration of Universal Human Rights, signed by the vast majority of nations says "Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, rece
187.
▲
by
JoshCole
4y ago
Went into that expecting something terrible - but he closed the issue because his implementation of JSON parsing conforms to what is actually valid JSON. Post issue closure a documentation update was suggested. It seems pretty reasonable to
188.
▲
by
JoshCole
4y ago
To give a bit more contrast - a lot of the other methods people are sharing will definitely help your memory. Getting enough sleep is important. So is eating well. Yet if your goal is to improve your memory to an extreme - like lets say, fu
189.
▲
by
JoshCole
4y ago
Cramming the night before an exam isn't the same thing as teaching either. If we need to accept that teaching is always the outcome of the worst performing learners it would follow that schools don't teach children to read. After
190.
▲
by
JoshCole
4y ago
> I am familiar with virtually all the topics you are discussing, so you can skip the citations. I really can't, because other people might believe you if I don't; I don't hate them. I want them to know the truth. So I&#x
191.
▲
by
JoshCole
4y ago
> Everything that you do with your brain and paper can be duplicated on a computer. Can you stop pretending I'm talking about things that are computable when talking about things that don't terminate? When someone says that com
192.
▲
by
JoshCole
4y ago
> It isn't even clear what you mean by abstraction at all. I'm using abstraction in the sense of 'blueprint abstraction' from game theory. This is basically compression of the input to your learning algorithm. There e
193.
▲
by
JoshCole
4y ago
Even if you close your eyes, you would still know where your monitors are, where your keyboard is, where your laptop is, and so on. You would know where your bed was. Where the table where you eat sat and the number of chairs around it. If
194.
▲
by
JoshCole
4y ago
random314, you seem to want to be Tadelis, but my end of the line is not the end of the line that is silent; yours, on the other hand, is.
195.
▲
by
JoshCole
4y ago
> The OP was not discussing learning at all Yes they were. They were discussing teaching, which is related to learning. Moreover, the person they were responding to - they also were talking about learning. They talked about how it was go
196.
▲
by
JoshCole
4y ago
Having thought about this for a while - this is on you, not me. The idea that some computer programs take too long to finish if their input size is really large isn't a complicated one. You try to discredit the existence of this basic
197.
▲
by
JoshCole
4y ago
Waiting for your rebuttal. Worth nothing the problem isn't theoretical. We actually run into this 'we can't compute it fast enough' problem in practice. - When we tried to solve chess we couldn't, the branching fact
198.
▲
by
JoshCole
4y ago
Serious question. Putting aside all the stuff that basically make me feel like you are just calling me a moron and wasting my time: what do you disagree about? You keep treating the things I say like they are irrelevant jargon and not bothe
199.
▲
by
JoshCole
4y ago
I made the claim that problem simplification through an abstraction that has error can reduce computational complexity leading to improved solution quality. You responded by talking about people who are talking about Lagrange points. I foun
200.
▲
by
JoshCole
4y ago
> You fail to realise that we can prove theorems about linear algebra Obviously I realize we can prove theorems. If I didn't realize it was possible to prove things I wouldn't claim things were provable. This is false by contra
201.
▲
by
JoshCole
4y ago
If error in abstraction is never right to teach as the OP claims, then you're saying that computation using numbers shouldn't be taught. It literally doesn't matter what computer programming language you use. Every single one
202.
▲
by
JoshCole
4y ago
> One abstraction that is very useful is linear algebra which is an abstraction without errors. Bullshit. Your claim that there is no abstraction error in linear algebra (when run on computers - we're in subdiscussion related to pro
203.
▲
by
JoshCole
4y ago
Take the simplest problem of searching over a continuous range between zero and one exhaustively. Let the value you search for be 0.1. By a diagnolization argument we can realize that even a search carried on for an infinite amount of time
204.
▲
by
JoshCole
4y ago
The formal proofs aren't in a Hacker News comment; just go read game theory research papers. For example, https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~noamb/papers/17-NIPS-Safe.pdf Or go try and solve a moderately complicated any
205.
▲
by
JoshCole
4y ago
Abstractions are useful because they simplify and if you don't allow error you don't allow maximization of simplification. You can formally relate this to learning problem formulation complexity. When you do you encounter things l
206.
▲
by
JoshCole
4y ago
A lot of the principles they give are of the in dying you shall die variety of errors. Learning is counterintuitive. There are a lot of times in learning where getting what you want means intentionally getting what you don't want. As
207.
▲
by
JoshCole
4y ago
I believe you. Medium is the message is a term from media theory. It refers to the idea that messages aren't in a vacuum, but are shaped by where they are transmitted. Often that shape is a function of what the audience will find appe
208.
▲
by
JoshCole
4y ago
> they only teach you how to write as at a level that a 8 years old reader would understand. Many if not most modern writing advice will remind you to focus on your audience. Most audiences aren't composed of eight year olds. So it
209.
▲
by
JoshCole
4y ago
No, because games can be competitive and therefore there is an adversarial selection effect. If there is a motion which is hard then it follows that the other players will force you to make it. This isn't theoretical. It isn't unc
210.
▲
by
JoshCole
4y ago
Also have a computer with a ridiculous number of cores (32) that I want to keep busy. I've found Clojure to dominate the ease of parallelism. For problems that are actually stupidly parallel the number of changes to your code is often
More ›