Jolter

39 ms·

571.
by Jolter 4y ago
If you think the dose is too high, yet they found no significant effect compared to placebo, what would you expect would happen at a _lower_ dose?
572.
by Jolter 4y ago
I suppose a NUC or two will easily fit in there.
573.
by Jolter 4y ago
I couldn’t use one of those in my home, they’re simply too noisy.
574.
by Jolter 4y ago
A Program is not a Product. I guess the distinction is only important in larger organizations but trust me they are different professions.
575.
by Jolter 4y ago
They could, but clearly according to the article, they are not doing that. They are first revoking the license and notifying the affected party. I assume the lawsuit will be filed as soon as they have evidence that the notification is serve
576.
by Jolter 4y ago
If it were in my country, you’d send them a notification by registered mail. Then you’d get a receipt that they received it.
577.
by Jolter 4y ago
I’m pretty sure when the license is revoked, that includes the license for using it as well. The article doesn’t seem to state if they are redistributing it or not, but I’ll take your word for it. Without being a user of the infringing prod
578.
by Jolter 4y ago
It wouldn’t really be a (useful) revocation of the license if they were not legally notified.
579.
by Jolter 4y ago
Yes, presuming physical access as well as access to the signing key, an attacker could certainly deploy malicious microcode. It would be a very scary thing indeed. It seems a reasonable threat model if your adversary is a malicious state ac
580.
by Jolter 4y ago
The signing key has not been compromised, afaik.
581.
by Jolter 4y ago
Yeah, I’m not saying they made the right call… If they have any business sense they will just open up the microcode after this.
582.
by Jolter 4y ago
First, revoke the license. That means they are no longer permitted to redistribute the code. If they then continue to redistribute it, they are committing a copyright violation. That’s when there is cause for a lawsuit.
583.
by Jolter 4y ago
It’s not like Intel have no competition. They probably figured that if they didn’t cooperate with the media industry, AMD or someone else would, and eat their lunch when suddenly Sony movies can only be played on AMD devices.
584.
by Jolter 4y ago
I think there is an argument being made that the drone technology enables a distancing of “the person doing the killing” from the action. That being 200 miles, or 2000, from the person being killed lets one take the decision to kill more li
585.
by Jolter 4y ago
You guys actually have rabies over there? Scary.
586.
by Jolter 4y ago
According to the article, the evidence has sometimes been thrown out or rescinded in court.
587.
by Jolter 4y ago
There are tons of self-driving metros in use across the world already so that idea is nothing new. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_automated_train_system...
588.
by Jolter 4y ago
These things are also true. It is very very hard to find a rental flat in Stockholm. Slightly easier in Gothenburg, and easier still, the smaller and less attractive the town you choose. Some claim this shortage is due to over-regulation of
589.
by Jolter 4y ago
Yes, those two data points are trivially true. I’d perhaps argue that Italy is also a high-income country, but I’m not sure if it matters. My point is that the author is trying to make an argument for deregulation of the housing market. Yet
590.
by Jolter 4y ago
There are so many additional factors affecting fertility that it’s not even funny. How about making a map of countries with free/subsidized childcare and comparing it to that fertility map? I’m pretty sure you’d find nearly the same c
591.
by Jolter 4y ago
Wait - it almost seems like you think having a higher birth rate would be good for America? How so?
592.
by Jolter 4y ago
Yet populations across Europe are not shrinking. Birth rates may go up and down but people still want to move there. Seems to work, so far. To use the phrase “die out” stinks 30’s Germany to me, and I think you could stand to think twice be
593.
by Jolter 4y ago
GP states they have no ability to get a +1 while living with parents. I assume that if GP had a well paid job, they would move out to separate flat, rather than move parents into bigger flat. Wouldn’t you?
594.
by Jolter 4y ago
These two maps, taken in conjunction, do not provide a good argument for housing deregulation. Even if we accept that the maps correlate quite well (and ignore whether there is any causal link), there is an assumption that the author is not
595.
by Jolter 4y ago
Nice post contents, but is your shift key broken or something?
596.
by Jolter 4y ago
With ~1.5 posts an hour, 24/7, I’m sure you could see yourself how someone might arrive at the suspicion of automated posting (aka a bot).
597.
by Jolter 4y ago
Just flag my post and move on. It’s what I’m doing with your hourly reposts of old stories.
598.
by Jolter 4y ago
It’s posted by what seems like a repost bot.
599.
by Jolter 4y ago
Ah, that explains it. Link flagged.
600.
by Jolter 4y ago
Any particular reason that this is of interest today?

More ›