Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Jigsy
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
15 ms
·
181.
▲
by
Jigsy
3y ago
https://xkcd.com/1683/
182.
▲
by
Jigsy
3y ago
Although I use Xubuntu on an old laptop, I'm hoping this is an option rather than a "suck it up!" change. I'd rather just enter a password...
183.
▲
by
Jigsy
3y ago
My dislike of Go comes from the fact I've never been able to win it. So because of that, I refuse to play it. :P
184.
▲
by
Jigsy
3y ago
True. I just meant in a general sense. I love playing it.
185.
▲
by
Jigsy
3y ago
Probably because they have Shogi, which is also fun to play. They also like Go, which I hate. Absolutely love Mahjong, though. (Thanks Yakuza series!)
186.
▲
by
Jigsy
3y ago
Purely speculation for the most part.
187.
▲
by
Jigsy
3y ago
Obviously if it's using actual CSAM then the image in question should be illegal, but that sounds like something that would already be covered under existing laws anyway.
188.
▲
by
Jigsy
3y ago
> Maybe you could say it inspires people to go and do X, Y, and Z to children, but then you opened up the "crime is transitive" gates Actually, on that line of thought, incest porn is popular in Japan (not the step-mom/ste
189.
▲
by
Jigsy
3y ago
I'm probably the outlier in this regard, but I'd rather pedophiles and child molesters use AI rather than go out and endanger real kids. (Or endanger by proxy.) It's like countries like the Australia, Canada or the UK banning
190.
▲
by
Jigsy
3y ago
It isn't, though. I'd say it's 50/50. I started using the Internet in 1998, and the only advice my parents gave me was "Don't reveal anything about yourself online." (Thankfully I heeded their warning and
191.
▲
by
Jigsy
3y ago
> The problem is keeping the government backdoor key safe. Not a problem. Just change the locks every week. [tapping head]
192.
▲
by
Jigsy
3y ago
Online safety for kids begins at home. The problem is most parents are just too lazy.
193.
▲
by
Jigsy
3y ago
I'm not sure why people are assuming they've abandoned the idea. They've simply said it's not technically feasible. Which implies that later - through the power of delusions of grandeur - that it will become feasible.
194.
▲
by
Jigsy
3y ago
Yeah, goto gets a bad wrap imo. I mean, sure, nobody should be using it for loops, but if you're jumping right to the end of a function (or a while loop) and doing cleanup operations, is that such a bad thing?
195.
▲
Ask HN: Is arrow code sometimes unavoidable?
2 points
by
Jigsy
3y ago
|
3 comments
196.
▲
by
Jigsy
3y ago
Sadly, to paraphrase a now deceased UK judge: "Due process is whatever the government of the day says it is."
197.
▲
by
Jigsy
3y ago
Well, if the Police and Military have done nothing wrong, they've got nothing to hide.
198.
▲
by
Jigsy
3y ago
I personally won't use Signal because "Requires my phone number?" = Nope. But good on her for sticking with her principles. I did decide to use Session as a result of this bill, though, since that routes through a Tor-like sy
199.
▲
by
Jigsy
3y ago
> Goodness, I hate to be this guy, but do these petitions ever actually help? No. Honestly, online petitions aren't worth the paper they're written on.
200.
▲
by
Jigsy
3y ago
So unworkable. I've personally never used Tor, but the moment this bill goes live, I'll be setting up Whonix in a VM on Linux OS.
201.
▲
by
Jigsy
3y ago
People always seem to conveniently forget this. Labour are the party who passed that very nasty "Tell us your password or go to prison" law under "If you've done nothing wrong, you've got nothing to hide from law en
202.
▲
by
Jigsy
4y ago
It's amazing how many people are surprised by Labour suggesting this, considering it's the same party that introduced that "Tell us your password or go to prison." law.
203.
▲
Labour urges government to consider crackdown on VPNs
(independent.co.uk)
4 points
by
Jigsy
4y ago
|
2 comments
204.
▲
by
Jigsy
4y ago
Well, you gotta have a backup.
205.
▲
Sharing pornographic deepfakes to be illegal in England and Wales
(bbc.co.uk)
3 points
by
Jigsy
4y ago
|
1 comments
206.
▲
by
Jigsy
4y ago
A planned new law would make sharing pornographic deepfakes without consent a crime in England and Wales. Tackling the rise in manipulated images, where a person's face is put on someone else's body, is part of a crackdown on the
207.
▲
by
Jigsy
8y ago
How can you revive something that never died? :>