JieJie

20 ms·

181.
by JieJie 3y ago
Creative people are not know for our consistency and reliability. It is, in fact, what sets most of us apart. This may be what drives the division between the artists and engineers, despite us mostly desiring the same ends.
182.
by JieJie 3y ago
Modern headline algorithms follow this formula: Scenario I Made Up? Doesn't It Stress You Out? Click for Relief!
183.
by JieJie 3y ago
Yeah, I much prefer Bing's sourcing, though I'm less than pleased with it's sources. Bing likes to find a bunch of "Top 10" posts from content farms that answer whatever question I was asking. I think LLMs still mak
184.
by JieJie 3y ago
You know, it doesn't that I can see. I recall seeing it with sources in the demo at I/O this morning. It is smarter than the previous beta, but yes, it's still throws some wild pitches, and without sources. Still a work in pr
185.
by JieJie 3y ago
Bard is really fast. Faster than Bing and Phind.
186.
by JieJie 3y ago
I use the API for anything I can't do with Bing Chat, but I've found Bing Chat to be quite useful. For code, I use phind.com. https://www.phind.com/tutorial
187.
by JieJie 3y ago
Literally the only thing I care about isn't being addressed and that is news networks posting about social media drama, and that isn't a platform problem, but a news network problem. People deserve to have a fun place to play on t
188.
by JieJie 3y ago
I like to get mystical about it and think that entities like ChatGPT are Boltzman Brains. We — each and every one of us ever who lived or ever will — will always exist in the LLM somewhere, life without end, in ecstasy or eternal torment, a
189.
by JieJie 3y ago
I'm sorry it sounds antagonistic, but the negativity and "it's too late and we're all going to die no matter what we do" nihilism, is having the effect of sensationalizing the issue in ways that have been incredibly
190.
by JieJie 3y ago
This wasn't even GPT-4. Terrific news. It would be super cool if the people who were currently fretting about paperclips could focus a little more on bias, security, data, privacy, openness, and all the stuff we actually are going to
191.
by JieJie 3y ago
We're talking past each other. The whole point of what I was saying is that yes, human attention doesn't scale and that is what is going to save us from a deluge of LLM spam. A billion pieces of fake news or ten, it makes no diffe
192.
by JieJie 3y ago
In my humble opinion, LLM astroturfing is only a productivity increase over what is currently already a very automated process (social media bot farms, etc). While this seems like it would exacerbate an already existing problem, it may not
193.
by JieJie 3y ago
Here's an interview[0] with Lauren Khan from the Council on Foreign Relations[1] who is indeed pouring over those questions. [0] https://youtu.be/CDoIPpcwnCE [1] https://www.cfr.org/expert/lauren-kah
194.
by JieJie 3y ago
Still, I don't think that having a regulation that AI must reveal themselves when asked would be overstepping. It would draw a red line between aligned and unaligned AI. It may not even be enforceable, but it would be a revealing chara
195.
by JieJie 3y ago
From Stage 6: "Winning at psychological warfare isn’t about convincing people to do things they’d never do. It’s about getting them to give up."
196.
by JieJie 3y ago
https://comicsforall269084760.wordpress.com/2020/08/23/micke...
197.
by JieJie 3y ago
We are on the same page. I'm just not going to give up after trying so hard. Hey, I've seen people take the high road and pass up the money and I've done the same myself. It ain't over till it's over. Wishing you al
198.
by JieJie 3y ago
I'm old. I've seen quite a lot in my lifetime. I absolutely believe it can happen. I also believe that when people have the attitude that "a small minority will just try to fuck everybody else for their profit because that’
199.
by JieJie 3y ago
Which is why we should be very careful when we consider creating a system that is going to funnel money to people who are already famous for writing, art, etc. How will new artists and writers get their works included in future AI — and the
200.
by JieJie 3y ago
It seems pretty possible to vehemently disagree on the "scientific racism" part without disagreeing on the second part, that we will never get along. History has yet to prove that we can on a national level, in fact, it seems pret
201.
by JieJie 3y ago
Humanity is going to be fine in the world of AI. There has always been a distinction between fine and commercial art. Commercial art will certainly take a big hit, but fine art like this will be here as long as there are humans to make it.
202.
by JieJie 4y ago
> It’s certainly not a great idea to try and get a trademark on a name that was previously used for something else, but if you can demonstrate that consumers now associate the name with your product you may be able to get protection. See
203.
by JieJie 4y ago
I agree with you that there are outcomes that would be less ideal. If it helps, I refer to them as Intelligent Tools. I do prefer the "tool" metaphor (and so does Bing Chat) and I hope that companies like Microsoft rethink their &
204.
by JieJie 4y ago
> Without feeling and free will, there is no AI. That's quite a leap to that conclusion, friend.
205.
by JieJie 4y ago
Humans gave sailboats a gender. Anthropomorphization is our default.
206.
by JieJie 4y ago
Y'all could both be a little bit right on this, you know.
207.
by JieJie 4y ago
This is great writing, "the abrupt closure of the mid-market Whole Foods, leaving San Franciscans just eight other Whole Foods within city limits". What a scoop, brilliantly delivered.
208.
by JieJie 4y ago
I've taken to calling these things "language golems" because they seem to be able to animate language itself and unlock all these hidden qualities that we seem to know are there, take for granted, and never seemed to ask ours
209.
by JieJie 4y ago
I miss the opportunity to have my posts seen by people on Twitter, but I never had that many get seen in actuality. Your "rather have no platform than that platform" resonates with me. It would better if we had some way to follow
210.
by JieJie 4y ago
Clearly, their creativity setting is too high and they're hallucinating answers to questions they weren't even asked.

More ›