Jerrrry

25 ms·

271.
by Jerrrry 3y ago
not (relatively) odd as I'm 16in taller than average; but oddly it inverts itself due to some weird motion-schematic and i had to put the trucks on backwards to compensate.
272.
by Jerrrry 3y ago
Ask them what they think about teenagers drinking energy drinks. The dichotomy is so full of cognitive dissonance it's a decent litmus test for self awareness.
273.
by Jerrrry 3y ago
>ms auth is apparently mostly compromised just gonna drop that like that aint a $10k+ implication, gonna need a src or ref thanks unless you mean by 3letters, which dont exactly give their backdoors to randoms. randoms aint coming across
274.
by Jerrrry 3y ago
I have 120mm hot pink wheels and ha e 4inch spacer to avoid wheel bite
275.
by Jerrrry 3y ago
fuck that was sick
276.
by Jerrrry 3y ago
make it do a barrel roll
277.
by Jerrrry 3y ago
replace orangered with random color, lil more visually descriptive: javascript:document.querySelectorAll("*") .forEach(el=>el.style.outline=`1px solid ${ Math.floor(Math.random()*2*16).toString(16)
278.
by Jerrrry 3y ago
https://www.google.com/search?q=loopback+ip+address
279.
by Jerrrry 3y ago
Literal security theatre.
280.
by Jerrrry 3y ago
"We must comply with legal subpoenas in the jurisdiction in which we operate,"
281.
by Jerrrry 3y ago
Large black holes are the most spherical things in the relative sense, not in an absolute sense; although more so than pico-black holes, which are not very spherical. Light cones/the 4d-radii of causality are* perfectly spherical.
282.
by Jerrrry 3y ago
Thank you, this is one of the most understood 'facts', especially regarding "prompt hacking/jailbreaking"
283.
by Jerrrry 3y ago
Yup, networks with a neuron count above a certain threshold (2+T?) will likely be on the IDAR restriction list again.
284.
by Jerrrry 3y ago
I know these are all words, but its arrangement in a culinary sense is so unfamiliar I would assume this was output from the neo-markov chain-gang. im sure its good though.
285.
by Jerrrry 3y ago
You have to be lucky. Hard work makes you a magnitude more lucky. everything and everyone else is just peanut-butthurt and jelly.
286.
by Jerrrry 3y ago
Dolby wouldn't appreciate it.
287.
by Jerrrry 3y ago
> it complies with whatever arbitrary thing the state Except if they'd like to keep their "anointed" status, from both a legal (platform vs publish) and extrajudicial (third party doctrine, parallel construction) Security
288.
by Jerrrry 3y ago
>"people on HN often (ignore the HN guidelines to) say that a comment here belongs on Reddit," shame is the best moderator
289.
by Jerrrry 3y ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcpQ-eCOwOU
290.
by Jerrrry 3y ago
Breakthroughs where the newest "zeta-slotting" technique and mathematical group theory are crossing may see sub-4 second averages to those savants skilled enough to optimally solve the needed corner-edge pairs and insert them whil
291.
by Jerrrry 3y ago
If you had a decent dose, then yes, for weeks/months after, you can close your eyes, think, and start to see shapes. It is not what D.A.R.E describe as LSD, being stored in your spinal fluid - more of a HPPD/PTSD artifact of the m
292.
by Jerrrry 3y ago
Yes, since it hadn't been mentioned elsewhere: cannabis can trigger an EXTREME early onset of CEV (Closed Eye visuals) when coming up on LSD. Like: massive bong rip "Damn, those neighbors dogs should stop barking. Or maybe I cou
293.
by Jerrrry 3y ago
Agreed, I didn't mean to trivialize DMT, I shoulda prefaced it by saying I tripped last night, 75mg vaporized, and managed a 16 minute torrent of geometry without ego death, which was unique (stim/dizzos). Really, it may be the be
294.
by Jerrrry 3y ago
>On the other hand, GP is saying things elsewhere in thread that feel... insufficiently substantiated, to be generous. >insufficiently substantiated we are literally talking about effects that cannot, by definition, be articulated or
295.
by Jerrrry 3y ago
If you do DMT three times in a day, you are already fucked in the head.
296.
by Jerrrry 3y ago
You say so much truth just too stumble over semantics, it really is hard to assume good faith when you literally misquote me. >if you believe in the adverse effects then they will hold more weight on your psyche. In this sense OP's
297.
by Jerrrry 3y ago
>Please please please stop recommend benzodiazepines so casually. benzo's and -olam's are a horrible drug that should not be taken except in the most extreme of circumstances - I compare it directly with electro shock therapy.
298.
by Jerrrry 3y ago
>describing something as "overpowering, glorious, and delightful" dangerously misrepresent each person's own experience. It's nnDMT, not 5meoDMT. She will not hurt you, and it is literally so overpowering, it is not c
299.
by Jerrrry 3y ago
Addiction potential, which is contextually oxymoronic. Everyone knows Xanax and other -zolams will turn you into a demented zombie after a few years of (ab?)use. It's nearly impossible to kill yourself with it (benzos) alone, but combi
300.
by Jerrrry 3y ago
>4-aco-Dmt and shrooms are both pro drugs of psilocin so they’re functionally the same molecule except 4acoDMT doesn't have to react with your stomach acids, causing other second order effects, which have been attributed to the stom

More ›