7 ms·
> it complies with whatever arbitrary thing the state Except if they'd like to keep their "anointed" status, from both a legal (platform vs publish) and extraj
by Jerrrry 3y ago
> it complies with whatever arbitrary thing the state
Except if they'd like to keep their "anointed" status, from both a legal (platform vs publish) and extrajudicial (third party doctrine, parallel construction)
Security vs Convenience, as always; the security of the privacy of personal data and papers, versus the convenience of the government's interests of national importance, such as, in their minds, maintaining social order.
If it's our government's job to keep the peace, our job to make sure the ends justify the means.
- mrguyorama 3y ago>platform vs publish This myth is so stupid. There is no distinction in law. There is only a distinction for "common carrier" which has a MUCH higher legal requirement of basically being physically required for survival, and even then, often not applied to systems which arguably should be a common carrier (internet)