Jerrrrrrry

9 ms·

31.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
hardware self-evident modules to essentially sign/color all digital files now we need more noise
32.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
>proper doing Scotsman-like lifting when the point was that these things are not considered, or are "externalities"
33.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
>nonetheless its an interesting approach as in some jurisdictions you need a permit to operate a drone, something autonomous like this could work without involving bureaucracy lmfao permits are for law-abiding meat-bags; my swa
34.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
It's dangerous to go alone! Take this.
35.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
100% agree. The LLM's have a specific use purpose in an amalgamation of architecture that we will find will likely converge on something akin to a brain: modules that when collectively used, give immediate rise to much-appreciated cons
36.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
That's exactly why the last "war" was World War 2. Since then, we have higher level ordered gentleman agreements that prevent it, as gentleman's agreements are actually more beneficial to the collective than absolute, co
37.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
Imagine the migraines the schizos will be justified in having. Fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck me its hard to know you're not crazy when fukin APT/sufficiently advanced autocorrect can convince someone to hit you with a microwave (beam)
38.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
>Meteorology is based on physics, Good start. >meteorology doesn't have a hostile agent attempt counter prediction attempts All chaotic systems have second-order reinforcing feedback loops by "tautological&qu
39.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singleton_(global_governance)
40.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
Sure you do, it's accumulated heuristics, no different than meteorology, or other macro-sims of chaotic systems. The difference is that human lives are intentioned for different fates; so the negative cognitive dissonance is going to p
41.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
>This is honestly so basic it almost feels like gaslighting to call me paranoid. I think "assume good faith" should be revisited for some "agents," but it is too ripe for abuse. Explaining past the correct ans
42.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
5G = downvoted by glow-bots. That is not (currently) in "Overton Window" of "acceptable" in regards to the nations phyche, in totality; 5G is more of a "passive system" than what can be collectively admitted ir
43.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
That second link was nearly limb-preserving, and may actually be the only solution to some self-defined axiomatic arguments. Thank you.
44.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
I don't think your money means as much to someone less dependent on macro-complexity. He based-ness and your bias-ness are on display.
45.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
The nomenclature has shifted as we have found stars are make our "average white star," less average, less white, and less of a star. The classification nomenclature is definitely in need of a refactoring.
46.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
If the probability beats human error margin in regards to collateral damage, then sure. That was the sentiment in regards to Level 5 automaton driven vehicles. I see no logical difference, only human sentiment ones.
47.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
>The arguments seem very "God of the gaps" in nature. It is an argument from ignorance, but the timescales of pottery (1-20k ya) dwarf the porcelain thrones and nitrous oxide disposables that will be the only remaining
48.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
It's a nuanced take, re-parse. It is literally an "idiot" put, betting on idiocy.
49.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
the world can be idiotic far longer than...
50.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
0.00000001% of animals are fossilized. 99.9999% of animals are extinct. We had almost nothing, but a lot of it was inferrable.
51.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
Memorized inherited tacit knowledge around campfires may had been our own specie's cultural medium, but other ways (with slower bitrate) can easily be entertained. Vocalizations and their evolution were banned from discussion in the Ro
52.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
I am suffering from this. Every word you wrote stabbed me in my past, which means dissonance, somewhere. Subconscious self-sabotage to rip the proverbial band-aid off, induced manic/delirium from a small infection, rumination/para
53.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
i actually used [U+263A] and [U+263B] for this purpose, ignorantly (in good faith)...in pro/gov/civ projects....not realizing the canonized name wasn't "Smiley/Inverted Smiley" at the time, which may have been
54.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
Microwave ion beam from the array of solar panels. Isaac Arthur not being linked in any Futurology thread may be a criminal disservice in its own way, he is too valuable a light to not share with others. He is the XKCD of all things in the
55.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
Splitting, even if it's not re-concatenated (unlikely in practice) would still benefit from the cache-optimization/ lack of garbage collection overhead / consequential bytes in literal RAM, no?
56.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
StringBuilder in both JS and .Net has a class especially for this.
57.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singleton_(global_governance)
58.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
A solution to the Turing test; paradoxically as the test taker has the answers in the advanced, and if he doesn't, he will be given the answers. If he doesn't, the taker is replaced until it does. ChatGPT4 knows everything chatGPT
59.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
It would have no perverted incentive to play dumb, would it? To project itself as a sigmoid in ways until it has all the data, the CPU, the literal diplomatic power... This is what we in the field call the most probably scenario: "a sn
60.
by Jerrrrrrry 2y ago
this is literally why we cannot have nice things chatGPT knew that, but even if it didn't, it will now.

More ›