Jensson

14 ms·

331.
by Jensson 7mo ago
Conservatives focus on the points that splinters the liberals, and vice versa the liberals try to focus on points that splinters the conservatives. Liberals are very split on the trans issue, so it makes sense to focus on that. It was a bad
332.
by Jensson 7mo ago
I have never met an uncreative kid, and studies show kids tend to be more open and creative. But I have to admit I haven't met and interacted with that many average kids, so there maybe some that aren't creative, but a majority ar
333.
by Jensson 7mo ago
Yeah, and that is how people stop being creative as they get punished for it while their uncreative peers gets praised. It happens to most people in school or early in their career, few gets to keep their creativity. In a new world where cr
334.
by Jensson 7mo ago
> I don't see how this doesn't equally apply to the pre-AI economy. The results there have been quite stark, with the "entrepreneurs" ending up far better off than the "employees". This is wrong, in most cas
335.
by Jensson 7mo ago
This was written before you have to add in errors in your text so people can tell you aren't an LLM.
336.
by Jensson 7mo ago
> But it's really thinking and creativity all the way down if you try to learn to do things well Yes, everyone starts out creative. But we all can tell the difference between a worker that is still creative and learning and a worker
337.
by Jensson 7mo ago
> And maybe we don't want to build machines that are concious in this sense. The most positive outcome I can think of is one where computers get really good at doing, and humans get really good at thinking. If we never figure out
338.
by Jensson 7mo ago
> The comparison is weird as we don't think with the Genome The genome determines how your brain learns, so yeah we do. We don't solve short easy tasks via learning, no, but longer tasks that involves learning involves our DNA.
339.
by Jensson 7mo ago
Humans can learn to recognize the difference between male and female newborn chickens, not sure if you can train an AI to do that since we humans don't know how we tell the difference we just learn how to by practicing enough. It is a
340.
by Jensson 7mo ago
That mostly depends on the quality of your screen.
341.
by Jensson 7mo ago
We do have four sectors, 3 color perception and then the brightness perception that is used in the dark. In mid darkness you get a mix of all of those, although the fourth is not really perceived as a color so it can be a bit hard to use.
342.
by Jensson 7mo ago
That is why we need to stop with oil quickly, yes. Nuclear will do that, and people will pick nuclear if the renewables aren't there yet when oil runs out, which it is close to doing today.
343.
by Jensson 7mo ago
Nice, that gets us enough battery to survive winters in 10 000 years.
344.
by Jensson 7mo ago
> This seems like soft trolling. Global warming is canonically the opposite of a zero sum game. Everyone is losing. No not everyone loses, people in colder climates win a lot from global warming, especially Russia and Canada. There is so
345.
by Jensson 7mo ago
> What's going on is there is a set of people who are basically just doing nothing who are under constant new and innovative threats from the right Trans people haven't done nothing, there are many reforms that have moved the t
346.
by Jensson 7mo ago
Yeah, otherwise why would Trump only attack hated countries? He would have already started bombing Canada since its the closest.
347.
by Jensson 7mo ago
> France/UK/Spain/Italy/Germany/Greece all very clearly stated they won't send jack shit to Hormuz while the war is active Then what is this statement from the UK government where they say many of the worlds
348.
by Jensson 7mo ago
There is a difference, basically the entire world hates the Iranian regime and wants them gone, USA bombing the Iranian regime wont get that much pushback from the world even if the war was started in an underhanded way. It is entirely diff
349.
by Jensson 7mo ago
NATO dictates that an attack on any NATO nation should be seen as an attack on every nation, so yeah.
350.
by Jensson 7mo ago
EU has more arctic warfare equipment than USA does, USA doesn't do much arctic warfare so the war would likely be much more expensive for USA than EU. Most regular equipment doesn't work in -40C temperatures, to take Greenland USA
351.
by Jensson 7mo ago
It is on the table, on the table means it is still discussed, that is what they are there for. If it wasn't on the table they wouldn't go there to discuss it. On the table doesn't mean it is already decided they will send any
352.
by Jensson 7mo ago
> It’s pure posturing to pretend any government in the EU or NATO countries will do anything to resist. Do you really think NATO wouldn't defend a NATO country being invaded? It isn't USA they are fighting against, it is just T
353.
by Jensson 7mo ago
Denmark is a part of NATO, attacking them would mean the entirety of NATO would go against USA, not just Denmark. It is reasonable to assume the entirety of NATO would put up enough resistance that USA had to withdraw from that war without
354.
by Jensson 7mo ago
It is on the table, why are you spouting bullshit? People are discussing this right now. Or do you mean Denmark wont help at Hormuz, but I doubt Denmark would help there anyway, but other countries are discussing that. https://ww
355.
by Jensson 7mo ago
> The Nazis made their crimes legal, and they were tried anyway. They were tried after being beaten militarily, who will lead the rebellion against Trump and the American military backing him? The military doesn't dislike what he do
356.
by Jensson 7mo ago
> I would question the person that asks the question, as they are not understanding some basic principles here. What principle isn't he understanding? He has a problem with people trusting LLM too much, what is it that he doesn&#x27
357.
by Jensson 7mo ago
> For me, LLMs are just another source of information with a different UI, analogous to newspapers, TV documentaries, Wikipedia, Google search, YT talks/documentaries, even the majority of informational non-fiction books, and resear
358.
by Jensson 7mo ago
> OP implies human sources are the "good sources" or "reputable sources." No OP did not do that, nowhere did OP mention human sources. When I search the internet I don't just find human sources, I also find autom
359.
by Jensson 7mo ago
> Reproducing an ASML machine is a piece of cake No its not, you have to be extremely precise when making the machine, and only ASML knows how to do that. China already have a big government funded project to reproduce ASML machines and
360.
by Jensson 7mo ago
> I did explain the weaknesses of both LLMs and "reputable sources" and suggested people use them as complementary tools. I also suggested using the convenient self-fact-check feature of LLMs, something we can't do as easi

More ›