Jensson

15 ms·

361.
by Jensson 7mo ago
I think the main tell is that it says basically nothing, it reads like a human that is paid per word. Humans prefer easy to read articles that doesn't hide the point behind such fluff, so there is no reason to do it except just to spam
362.
by Jensson 7mo ago
> The big AI companies seem to want to make all their blog posts and communications have the AI tells so you know they didn't actually bother writing them Investors want to see you use your own product, if they themselves don't
363.
by Jensson 7mo ago
Studies showed wikipedia was about as accurate as encyclopedias, so that fear was already debunked. That is not true for LLM, LLM are much less accurate than encyclopedias still since there is no limit to how far you can push them while enc
364.
by Jensson 7mo ago
How does this answer the question: "how do you deal with people who trust LLMs?"? Nothing you are saying explains how to deal with such people.
365.
by Jensson 7mo ago
Clickbait journalists answers like that, experts mostly don't. But it does make sense it mimics clickbait journalists more since it was trained on the internet.
366.
by Jensson 7mo ago
That depends on which part of Google. I worked in the hot path of the search queries and there speed was extremely important for everything, they want to do so much there every single query and latency isn't allowed to go up.
367.
by Jensson 7mo ago
Rule 3 was true 1989, back then computers were so slow and had barely any ram so most things you did only was reasonable for small number of inputs. Today we almost always have large amounts of inputs so its different.
368.
by Jensson 7mo ago
> The claim that books know things seems suspicious to me I didn't say the book knows things, but everyone can agree that books has knowledge in them. Hence something possessing knowledge doesn't make it intelligent. For exampl
369.
by Jensson 7mo ago
But an intelligent being could learn that, do you think they become more intelligent if you tell them things are made out of atoms? To me the answer is very simple, no they don't become more intelligent.
370.
by Jensson 7mo ago
You can give an intelligent being knowledge but you can't give a book intelligence. So I think its easy to separate knowledge from intelligence.
371.
by Jensson 7mo ago
You can easily make it more reliable just by making larger features, and then no mechanical thing can even come close to compare to how reliable digital circuits are. There is a reason 40 year old NES consoles still works today, they are ve
372.
by Jensson 7mo ago
Bread, cheese etc have names that says what it is that is unrelated to brand. That is the normal way for most products, a minority of products in the grocery stores I visit are brand only, most things you can get essentially the same from a
373.
by Jensson 7mo ago
Why does it sound horrible to have your code reviewed quickly? There is no reason for reviews to wait a long time. 4 hours is already a long time, it means you can wait to do it right before you go home or after lunch.
374.
by Jensson 7mo ago
Average American eat around 60 pounds a year, typically you eat less than a full pound when you eat so yeah they probably eat more than once per week. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/per-capita-meat-usa Given the $1
375.
by Jensson 7mo ago
Still meat is very low sodium, it is weird to say plant based alternatives have less sodium since both have as much salt as you add since there is almost none naturally.
376.
by Jensson 7mo ago
But USA isn't the richest country on earth yet why do they spend the most? Edit: I recognize that post now, he uses a special metric "actual individual consumption", which adds healthcare consumed by people as income. So the
377.
by Jensson 7mo ago
> The only reason we don’t have universal healthcare is basically unlucky flukes. You think its a fluke and not intentional corruption of the system? These companies pays both parties a lot so nobody will ever fix this, that isn't a
378.
by Jensson 7mo ago
Lotteries are pure gambling because you can't influence things, I guess that is what he meant. The examples you mentioned are then "impure gambling" since its inherently possible to influence the outcome without breaking the
379.
by Jensson 7mo ago
> If the managers are not taking bribes or favors for better treatment that isn't corruption You have a very narrow definition of corruption here. A manager using his management powers to intentionally make his life easier at the co
380.
by Jensson 7mo ago
But the corruption is still available to you, and you use it as a part of daily life. Not all corruption but some.
381.
by Jensson 7mo ago
> One of the main differences I've heard referenced is that acting and being a movie star means that the work is fundamentally differentiable via the end-product, where producing software is meant to have the same outcome no matter
382.
by Jensson 7mo ago
You also have to count that people often view these events together in front of the same client. Superbowl isn't shown on that many TV's, its usually a lot of people watching each screen, so you have to count the same way for the
383.
by Jensson 7mo ago
You know there is a tech industry outside of the bay area?
384.
by Jensson 7mo ago
Claude Code is not vibecoded, it is made using Claude Code but it is not vibecoded using Claude Code.
385.
by Jensson 7mo ago
It is a lot harder to cheat on a live stream though.
386.
by Jensson 8mo ago
> I thought that the chasm that AI couldn't cross was generality. By which I mean that you'd train a system, and it would work in that specific setting, and then you'd tweak just about anything at all, and it would fall ov
387.
by Jensson 8mo ago
Trump and Elon still afford to look stupid, you can do it your whole life.
388.
by Jensson 8mo ago
"The people I think are smart are those that try to look smart", that is the most plausible. There are probably many smart people who aren't afraid of looking stupid that you think are stupid for that reason. Personally I dis
389.
by Jensson 8mo ago
> Its still adding to the debt Not really, this increases the profits of American oil and gas exports, USA is one of the countries that benefits from higher prices. You could argue that just benefits petrol companies, but overall USA doe
390.
by Jensson 8mo ago
But you don't need to put the military under the direct command of the civilian president like US does, if parliament can take military action against the civilian president and civilian action against the military leader then they hav

More ›