Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
J-dawg
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
29 ms
·
241.
▲
Facebook's underclass
(theguardian.com)
4 points
by
J-dawg
9y ago
|
1 comments
242.
▲
by
J-dawg
9y ago
A modern equivalent, that I found uplifting to read about: https://www.theguardian.com/travel/2016/jan/29/blind-backpac...
243.
▲
by
J-dawg
9y ago
I thought the photo of the two basins at 90 degrees to each other was a nice example that it sometimes makes sense to violate the DRY principle. Someone must have looked at installing a gimballed basin, realised how complicated the custom-m
244.
▲
by
J-dawg
9y ago
"The world belongs to the easily amused" sounds like a great philosophy to live by. I'm going to remember that!
245.
▲
by
J-dawg
9y ago
It actually sounds awful. Imagine having to miss something you were really looking forward to, then spend the following week on enforced leave. It would get old fast.
246.
▲
by
J-dawg
9y ago
> when washing machines lasted ~5x as long Planned obsolescence is so damned depressing. Imagine how much CO2 and energy could be saved if washing machines simply lasted as long as they did 25 years ago (concrete counterweight or not!)
247.
▲
by
J-dawg
9y ago
Thanks for asking this. Here's another one that was posted and then disappeared without a trace: https://www.reddit.com/r/slatestarcodex/comments/6t1cpx/if_w...
248.
▲
by
J-dawg
9y ago
Update from the developer: https://twitter.com/chrispederick/status/892780120032681984
249.
▲
by
J-dawg
9y ago
I'd love to be able to simply buy clothes with sizing that is 100% consistent and doesn't vary from year to year. Several times I've ordered what I thought was an identical product to something I already own, only to find the
250.
▲
by
J-dawg
9y ago
That's an interesting counter-argument, thanks. But I still don't think I agree with you. The problem here is that it's left up to police to decide what is a "dangerous ideology". It's not something that you ca
251.
▲
by
J-dawg
9y ago
I happened to catch a Radio 4 documentary [0] on Sunday about the government's "Prevent" strategy, which aims to find evidence of extremism in places such as schools and "nip terrorism in the bud". It featured sever
252.
▲
by
J-dawg
9y ago
I've been having some therapy recently, and one of the things the therapist has pointed out is that the more anxious I am, the more I make negative generalisations. I believe this is quite a common pattern in anxiety & depression.
253.
▲
by
J-dawg
9y ago
Thanks for sharing your story, it was nice to read. It's good to have a counter-example to prove that people can and do meet their spouses online. I tried online dating about 7 years ago and found it ok, had a few interesting dates but
254.
▲
by
J-dawg
9y ago
> Plus, it varies by the context I guess this is the core of my question. How much is something allowed to vary by context before it's basically rendered meaningless as an idea?
255.
▲
by
J-dawg
9y ago
> Forget about introversion vs extraversion. Its waste of time. What makes you say that? I ask because I've also become slightly sceptical of the idea. Is there real, empirical evidence for people being one or the other? I remembe
256.
▲
by
J-dawg
9y ago
I guess trying to reverse cultural change will always be seen as more xenophobic than keeping outside influences away in the first place. This is illogical, I suppose, since really they amount to the same thing.
257.
▲
by
J-dawg
9y ago
I strongly agree with this. Internet dating generally has become a toxic experience for men. It definitely increased my feelings of loneliness. Anyone who is already lonely or lacking self-esteem should stay well away.
258.
▲
by
J-dawg
9y ago
This is a very interesting question, and one that's being asked all over the world at the moment. To use the example of Brexit - I sometimes feel like the 'Remain' side, in accusing 'Leave' of xenophobia & racis
259.
▲
by
J-dawg
9y ago
This is a great point, and I wish stuff like this was talked about more often. I think I often naively assume that advertising only exists to encourage us to buy one product in preference to another. Of course, as you say, it's much mo
260.
▲
by
J-dawg
9y ago
But then how would the Food Standards Agency get access to my browsing history? https://www.reddit.com/r/unitedkingdom/comments/5ei5dz/list_...
261.
▲
by
J-dawg
9y ago
That is indeed incredibly disturbing, and appears to answer my question that the police would use someone completely unrelated to the person they're trying to arrest. There seems to have been no link between the crime Hoffman was accus
262.
▲
by
J-dawg
9y ago
Gideon is the one being entrapped (or not, I don't know the law around this). I'm specifically talking about the treatment of Frank, who appears to have been coerced into helping to catch Gideon.
263.
▲
by
J-dawg
9y ago
Good point. I was aware of the Mark Kennedy thing. It's utterly shameful. I certainly didn't mean to imply some kind of moral superiority over the US system. Our police have done some appalling, corrupt things. Conducting surveill
264.
▲
by
J-dawg
9y ago
That sounds awful. It does make you wonder what could have happened if you hadn't been there to provide a clear alibi.
265.
▲
by
J-dawg
9y ago
> Also, whoever you want to target may already know the informant and have some implicit level of trust in them. Yeah, I get the idea of using an informant who is linked to the person you're trying to catch. It makes sense as a wa
266.
▲
by
J-dawg
9y ago
OK, I feel very naive now! I am quite shocked by this. Is this a thing throughout the USA? I'm pretty sure I've never heard of anything remotely like this in the UK (maybe being naive again, please correct me if I'm wrong.) T
267.
▲
by
J-dawg
9y ago
> This man, let’s call him Frank, was in trouble for some financial infraction. Frank cut a deal with the authorities. They’d go easy on him if he’d wear a wire and lure Gideon into plotting to burn down his building. Is it common prac
268.
▲
by
J-dawg
9y ago
I'm glad I scrolled far enough down my 'threads' page to see that you'd replied! Thank you for the recommendation. I will check out the book and may also take you up on your kind offer to speak directly. Should I use the
269.
▲
by
J-dawg
9y ago
This seems like rather bleak advice but it is a very good point. It can create so much tension if you're not 100% on the same page financially. Also, if you plan to have kids and are likely to be both the higher earner and not the prim
270.
▲
by
J-dawg
9y ago
I'm surprised nobody has mentioned the analogy to taking away an epileptic's driving licence. People who regularly suffer epileptic seizures are not allowed to drive, for example, but we don’t think of this ban as “punishing” the
More ›