Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ItsBilly
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
ItsBilly
16y ago
I bet when a company asks you if they can contact you with "special offers from our partners" you always say yes because they didn't call them "ads"
2.
▲
by
ItsBilly
16y ago
http://labs.adobe.com/wiki/index.php/Wallaby#Release_Notes "Actionscript 1,2 - Unsupported" "Actionscript 3 - Unsupported" Then it's not Flash. I really don't have a need to convert any animations from 2002 into the hippest standards. I'v
3.
▲
by
ItsBilly
16y ago
I'd bet every bullet point is covered by at least 3 ridiculous patents.
4.
▲
by
ItsBilly
16y ago
It does for me anyway, in Chrome. It makes it nearly impossible to close the tab.
5.
▲
by
ItsBilly
16y ago
The article is titled "Setting the record straight", but it is not fair to say that "Bing sets the record straight"
6.
▲
by
ItsBilly
16y ago
OkCupid was always one big inside joke. That line is just part of it And it may rotate now, but it didn't used to, years ago. I distinctly remember it saying Match.com and nothing else.
7.
▲
by
ItsBilly
16y ago
No, using a vague and loaded word like "open" at all is what is confusing and misleading. It's watered down to "Web 2.0" levels.
8.
▲
by
ItsBilly
16y ago
It can't be "technically" open because there's no technical definition of open. Under one side's definition, just having a lot of industry players collaborate on it in public makes it open (the definition you're using) whereas the other sid
9.
▲
by
ItsBilly
16y ago
FYI, that test suite is said to be about 0.1% complete. Yes, you read that right. No browser is remotely that compliant. Microsoft already idiotically used that suite to declare themselves king of canvas http://www.pcworld.com/businesscent
10.
▲
by
ItsBilly
16y ago
It's not for end-users. It's a service for developers to add to their web application. You can certainly try to coax all your users into pre-encoding their video - and understanding how to do that - if you like....
11.
▲
by
ItsBilly
16y ago
They give themselves too much credit for the SSL prediction. Firesheep wasn't a new attack on an SSL, it was an old one in a package so convenient that everyone finally paid attention. For a moment. As for GSM, yeah, that's just the old "co