Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
IshKebab
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
38 ms
·
961.
▲
by
IshKebab
6mo ago
I don't think you really need those calculations to know that it is always going to be less viable than a traditional data centre. It's like the idea about putting data centres under water. I'm sure you can do it and you ca
962.
▲
by
IshKebab
6mo ago
Yeah my screen broken and I was in that situation and you're right; there's absolutely no way to access your phone. If you google it people will talk about workarounds like taking screenshots and accessing them over USB, but that
963.
▲
by
IshKebab
6mo ago
> just buy an audio interface and a cheap XLR mic. Don't do that. There are plenty of good USB microphones that don't need you to faff around with shitty XLR.
964.
▲
by
IshKebab
6mo ago
I presume they meant in Europe. St. George's Cross has long been a symbol of racism in the UK and they've recently been trying to do the same with the union jack. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c626v
965.
▲
by
IshKebab
6mo ago
Noble effort but that ship has sailed. Cargo works because it was there from the start so basically everyone uses it. C++ doesn't have one true package manager which means all third party dependencies will use totally different build s
966.
▲
by
IshKebab
6mo ago
Chromebook Pro is the obviously better choice in your list. Googlebook is clearly the worst.
967.
▲
by
IshKebab
6mo ago
And Box64, but I think the point is that this is closer to being guaranteed to work.
968.
▲
by
IshKebab
6mo ago
There's absolutely a moral high ground in it. That's the point. Nobody is arguing against Bambu's legal right to be arseholes.
969.
▲
by
IshKebab
6mo ago
No based on the abstract it can handle that code. What it can't handle is runtime code generation.
970.
▲
by
IshKebab
6mo ago
> It's really easy to access your phone’s files right from your Googlebook's file browser. Yeah but what about Windows Explorer? They've been passively blocking SMB access forever at this point (by disallowing ports below
971.
▲
by
IshKebab
6mo ago
Python has a quite random collection of stuff, and it's often quite low quality and people don't use it anyway. I wouldn't say it is close to Go. I haven't used Java for a decade or so but as I recall its standard librar
972.
▲
by
IshKebab
6mo ago
Because your colleagues insist on it and now you're stuck with slow Python despite telling them that this is exactly what would happen...
973.
▲
by
IshKebab
6mo ago
Why bother with a forge at all if you don't want to collaborate with other people?
974.
▲
by
IshKebab
6mo ago
> Then again I don’t even know what it means for something to be a core value. Yeah I think they're mostly useless. At least you definitely don't get core values by just declaring that they are your motto. For example Amazon
975.
▲
by
IshKebab
6mo ago
That's a really crazy number of employees considering they have one product that barely seems to change and is at best on par with similar products created by comparatively miniscule teams (Phabricator, Forgejo).
976.
▲
by
IshKebab
6mo ago
I guess it depends on the person because I've been wearing them every night for years with no side effects. I use those laser lite ones and use a new pair every night (they're very cheap). The only downside is you get used to the
977.
▲
by
IshKebab
6mo ago
I presume they were talking about C++? But yeah weird to bring that up in a comparison with Python of all things. A language with the build system equivalent of "stop hitting yourself". (At least until uv saved us from that bull
978.
▲
by
IshKebab
6mo ago
> Horrified at what must lurk beneath the façade It's Ruby, which is pretty horrific but still I think there was probably something not quite right in your setup because it isn't normally that slow.
979.
▲
by
IshKebab
6mo ago
I'm firmly not in Trump's anti-DEI camp but I have seen what can happen when you make it one of your core values. You can end up with a lot of people talking about it a lot, lots of meetings and initiatives rather than doing actua
980.
▲
by
IshKebab
6mo ago
It is DDoS for hire. What are you asking exactly?
981.
▲
by
IshKebab
6mo ago
I mean doubling in price is pretty significant though? I used to happily (well, grudgingly) spend $500 on a GPU. $1k is crazy though.
982.
▲
by
IshKebab
6mo ago
How many PRs from other people have you received on your self-hosted Forgejo instance?
983.
▲
by
IshKebab
6mo ago
Funny but not really true. It's not really any more bloated or confusing than Github. It's not really "enterprise grade" software. If you want that look at Jira or anything Microsoft produces.
984.
▲
by
IshKebab
6mo ago
> to approve a MR you need to click a button that is actually a menu It's not really any better on Github. Why do I have to click on "Files changed" to approve a PR? Overall I would say it is on par with Github. Worse in s
985.
▲
by
IshKebab
6mo ago
Terrible advice. In the real world you can't fully rewrite a project when it turns out that your obvious stupid solution isn't good enough. You're stuck with it forever.
986.
▲
by
IshKebab
6mo ago
Not really. In fact unsafe Rust is widely considered to be significantly harder to get right than C or Zig. E.g. see https://chadaustin.me/2024/10/intrusive-linked-list-in-rust/ or https://lucumr.p
987.
▲
by
IshKebab
6mo ago
> it also introduces other subtle bugs if your logic is wrong (e.g. you have edge 100 but actually those nodes were removed, so now you're pointing at the wrong node This is not actually a different kind of bug; it's just use-a
988.
▲
by
IshKebab
6mo ago
> Is there really any difference between using unsafe in your own code, versus wrapping it inside some crate? Yes, in the same way that there's a difference between using `std::Vec` (which uses `unsafe`), and writing an unsafe Vec c
989.
▲
by
IshKebab
6mo ago
96% tests passing sounds impressive, but I remember that C compiler that had similar (or better) stats yet was still hilariously broken because the test suite didn't cover many "obvious" things that a human wouldn't get
990.
▲
by
IshKebab
6mo ago
Err https://github.com/petgraph/petgraph What are you asking for exactly?
More ›