IsBisu

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by IsBisu 10y ago

   >Mapping = CreateFileMappingW(Handle, 0, PAGE_READWRITE, 0, FileSize, 0); So it is more a "case" not handled by dokan rather that all memory mapped not handled ? Is this made in purpose just to remove dokan from the bench ? &gt
2. 2.▲
   by IsBisu 10y ago

   I agree. It would even be more interesting or reliable if the benchmark could compare a MEMFS made by dokan author and not Winfsp author like here.
3. 3.▲
   by IsBisu 10y ago

   You say in your bench that Dokan support does not support memory mapped files but it does as I can see with fsx (memory mapped read/write enabled) running on their CI https://ci.appveyor.com/project/Maxhy/doka
4. 4.▲
   by IsBisu 10y ago

   You should better say that your userland FS is fast with WinFSP that with Dokan https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13129215
5. 5.▲
   by IsBisu 10y ago

   SSHFS has been on windows since a moment with Dokan https://github.com/Foreveryone-cz/win-sshfs
6. 6.▲
   by IsBisu 10y ago

   You should better say that YOUR MEMFS implementation is better on Winfsp that YOUR MEMFS implementation on Dokan. This is even not a far comparison.