Invictus0

7 ms·

91.
by Invictus0 7mo ago
I think you're being a bit dramatic
92.
by Invictus0 7mo ago
It was a supreme court decision that started this whole thing. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murphy_v._National_Collegiate_...
93.
by Invictus0 7mo ago
Adding friction helps
94.
by Invictus0 7mo ago
so its a webhook
95.
by Invictus0 7mo ago
your market idea makes no sense, and it could be outlawed easily.
96.
by Invictus0 7mo ago
your point is not clear to me. alcohol is legal and people are addicted to it
97.
by Invictus0 7mo ago
why can't we have a law that just caps your gambling losses? Everyone gets a federally issued gambling license tied to your ID, if you lose more than X amount the casino is no longer legally allowed to let you play. Casual gamblers can
98.
by Invictus0 7mo ago
Is the bookie gambling on the race? Is Jim Simons? Gambling is not innate to the games themselves, it's only gambling if the player chooses to treat it like a game of pure chance.
99.
by Invictus0 7mo ago
For anyone that hasn't seen it, or just wants to reminisce, here's Hindenburg's report on Nikola, Milton's previous scheme. It is a truly hilarious read. https://hindenburgresearch.com/nikola/
100.
by Invictus0 7mo ago
Betting on which card will be on top of a freshly shuffled deck is pure gambling. It is a game of pure chance. Betting on sports is not pure chance. If I play a game of tennis against roger federer, I am sure to lose. I can predict this eve
101.
by Invictus0 7mo ago
prediction markets are not pure gambling just as investing in stocks is not gambling.
102.
by Invictus0 7mo ago
if you can't tell the difference between a game of pure chance and predicting real world events then there is simply nothing to say
103.
by Invictus0 7mo ago
That's fundamentally wrong
104.
by Invictus0 7mo ago
I think you'd find the clay a bit dry for a refined palate.
105.
by Invictus0 7mo ago
It's not illegal in the US
106.
by Invictus0 7mo ago
Doubtful, there are other, less-well known pay-for-content platforms than take a smaller percentage cut than onlyfans. It wouldn't make any sense for a launderer to use the most expensive platform.
107.
by Invictus0 7mo ago
Are you aware that domains can be exchanged? And emails can be sent from domains?
108.
by Invictus0 7mo ago
There are probably more than 10^17 AI model executions occurring per day. I know in ye olde HN there are many Purists that are Too Good For AI, but the majority of the human race is consuming AI at a blinding rate, and if they really didn&#
109.
by Invictus0 7mo ago
You could have easily said this twenty years ago when photoshopped photos were going viral on the early internet. Turns out people are completely fine with ai content and photoshop.
110.
by Invictus0 7mo ago
For me, this is the smoking gun: > Our confidential sources tell us the still classified weapon has been tested in a U.S. military lab for more than a year. Tests on rats and sheep show injuries consistent with those seen in humans. Also
111.
by Invictus0 7mo ago
absolutely nothing can be done about this
112.
by Invictus0 7mo ago
I disagree that surveillance on its own is authoritarian, it doesn't even come close to meeting the definition. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authoritarianism
113.
by Invictus0 7mo ago
if the people broadly support and vote for mass democratic surveillance, is it still authoritarian and undemocratic?
114.
by Invictus0 7mo ago
It's not working very well at all. I started with a picture of a girl sitting at a cafe table and asked it to zoom in, and it enlarged her head to the size of a balloon.
115.
by Invictus0 8mo ago
Worrying about this is like focusing on putting a candle out while the house is on fire
116.
by Invictus0 8mo ago
Expensively
117.
by Invictus0 8mo ago
298,000 of those years didn't have toilet paper. It was utterly impossible for a single person to "end humanity" even 200 years ago; now, the president can do it in minutes by launching a salvo of nukes. Comparing the present
118.
by Invictus0 8mo ago
Too bad that doesn't extend to their government, which seems to have no problem spending their credit down to the wire...
119.
Ask HN: 10 months since the Llama-4 release: what happened to Meta AI?
55 points by Invictus0 8mo ago|12 comments
120.
by Invictus0 8mo ago
The NYT's top story is still focused on the killing of a single protestor in Minneapolis. They aren't highlighting Iran because a massacre of this scale will be seen as justifying Trump's imminent strike on Iran, and leftists

More ›