InternetGerbil

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by InternetGerbil 9y ago

   Here is the city's 2015 housing inventory: http://default.sfplanning.org/publications_reports/2015_Hous... It has more specific numbers, like in 2015, the city built 3,000 units and tore down 25. 15 of those were
2. 2.▲
   by InternetGerbil 9y ago

   You can't demolish 100 unit SRO in the mission, rightly so, without a development agreement that would relocate the current SRO tenants into a new building without interruption. There's no reason to have this kind of thing be an e
3. 3.▲
   by InternetGerbil 9y ago

   The question here is about housing demolished in order to build new housing. Merged units are not in this category. Merged units are when someone buys a duplex (or bigger) and removes all but one of the kitchens in the building and thereby
4. 4.▲
   by InternetGerbil 9y ago

   Yes, exogenous demand is the central question in the housing debate. That's one of the uses of a model, to think about one aspect of a process at a time.
5. 5.▲
   by InternetGerbil 9y ago

   There is no reason to assume that building new housing requires tearing down affordable units. That's the point of using the word "adding".
6. 6.▲
   by InternetGerbil 10y ago

   Scroll down to the bottom of the email. The bottom of all mailchimp emails tell you how the sender got your email. At the bottom of the email it reads: "Copyright © 2016 YIMBY Party, All rights reserved. You are receiving this email b