ImJamal

11 ms·

301.
by ImJamal 1y ago
You are missing the key point. A fetus is part of human development just like toddlers and adults. Ashes are not. Just like how a sapling is a tree even if it is still in a container. You don't have to wait for the tree to be transpla
302.
by ImJamal 1y ago
Human embryos are human. Are you suggesting there are human nonpersons?
303.
by ImJamal 1y ago
No. I'm saying three things. First, embryos are alive. Second, you were once an embryo (it is a stage in human development). Third, destroying an embryo means you ceased to exist, not that you never existed like the original person I r
304.
by ImJamal 1y ago
Why are you conflating personhood with being alive? Things can be alive without being a person. As far as I can tell no embryologist would deny that embryos are alive. The only debate is if they are a person. If you kill a dog then the dog
305.
by ImJamal 1y ago
First, things can be alive, but not persons. Second, personhood is a philosophical thing so the medical and scientific communities' opinions are not relevant Third, I looked up lived experience on wiki and it is talking about knowledge
306.
by ImJamal 1y ago
What does harm have anything to do with it? The person I was responding to said you wouldn't have existed which is false.
307.
by ImJamal 1y ago
Embryos are alive. Can you find an embroyotologist who would deny that?
308.
Workers describe abusive treatment in Taiwan's semiconductor factories(restofworld.org)
1 points by ImJamal 1y ago|1 comments
309.
by ImJamal 1y ago
Wordpad is being discontinued.
310.
by ImJamal 1y ago
You are just wrong. The Bible never says that rich people aren't getting into heaven. Only that it will be difficult.
311.
by ImJamal 1y ago
Have you ever played telephone? Messages get distorted in a couple minutes. Thousands of years is plenty of time to be easily believe that people would deviate on various gods.
312.
by ImJamal 1y ago
Who is going to fund Firefox if not Mozilla? Maybe a new organization can pop up or maybe a new one won't.
313.
by ImJamal 1y ago
Why only target two presidents? The US has been involved with funding for decades. Also, why only target US? Europe has helped fund projects that have gone into weapons research.
314.
by ImJamal 1y ago
> Yet nobody touches that 1% at the top, so real effective changes are really never seen, and haven't been seen since FDR There could be some movement on this. Trump has suggested a 2.6% increase on the top 0.2% https://w
315.
by ImJamal 1y ago
I'm on my phone so maybe I am missing something, but it looks like it is decently consistent over the last year. It is down from the first number from May of 2024 (by 1000).
316.
by ImJamal 1y ago
This is a slight tangent, but with Spring being owned by VMware, what do you think it's future looks like?
317.
by ImJamal 1y ago
And the Holocaust was 80 years ago?
318.
by ImJamal 1y ago
From the article > the US has sent more grants, while the EU sent more loans. While more money has come from the EU they are more in the form of loans which isn't really providing aid in the traditional sense.
319.
by ImJamal 1y ago
I'm not going to reply to everything because this conversation is not going anywhere and this will be my final post. There is no point in continuing when you have clearly taken so much out of context. First, what is this Latin barrier?
320.
by ImJamal 1y ago
Natural law isn't really related to the reason why people are motivated to do something. It is considered one motivation, but not the only one. Also, what does your comment have to do with gay penguins that i was responding to? I was j
321.
by ImJamal 1y ago
> Can you point to a bishop appointed by Jesus' 12 disciples who was not married with children? If not, then you are making a baseless assertion. First let me say more than just Paul was unmarried. John was also unmarried. There is
322.
by ImJamal 1y ago
> That article is pure sophistry. No actual reasoning why. Just the assertion that "we don't think it makes sense, so it doesn't matter". That's not how holy books are supposed to work. If they really are inspire
323.
by ImJamal 1y ago
Those are not real marriages according to the Church. Any sexual relation in that situation would be fornication and as such a single.
324.
by ImJamal 1y ago
So do Catholics including Latin rite priests?
325.
by ImJamal 1y ago
I am talking about men who are already priests cannot marry. I think you are talking about men who are married becoming priests which is allowed in the Catholic Church and well as the East. None of the Eastern churches allow priests to marr
326.
by ImJamal 1y ago
You are just wrong. You cannot find any reliable scholar who says "bishops are to be be married with kids." Like I said, it would mean that Paul was not legitimate which is just nonsense. Nobody believes that. You should read this
327.
by ImJamal 1y ago
I don't think you know what natural law means. This is from wikipedia. It wouldn't matter if 99% of animals and humans were gay. > Natural law[1] (Latin: ius naturale, lex naturalis) is a philosophical and legal theory that pos
328.
by ImJamal 1y ago
Which is why I said > The rules are more strict for Catholics than the others. You can be a married Catholic man and become a Catholic priest.
329.
by ImJamal 1y ago
The 10 commandments are the same. Catholics just order and number things differently than Protestants. Both have the same commandments, unfortunately, some Protestants can only read a sentence and don't
330.
by ImJamal 1y ago
Which leads to many Protestants saying the Bible is infallible, but which books belong to the Bible is not infallible. Which, don't tell them, means they have no clue if the books they think are infallible are actually infallible.

More ›